Our 2014 Christmas Contests have begun! Check the Bulbagarden Forums to find out how you could win 1 of 30 copies of ORAS!
Please remember to follow the manual of style and code of conduct at all times.
Check BNN and Bulbanews for up-to-date Pokémon news and discuss it on the forums or in our IRC channel #bulbagarden on irc.systemnet.info.

Talk:Super Mario Wiki

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search

Why would a Mario based subject like Super Mario Wiki have a page in a Pokémon Wiki like Bulbapedia? --SeanWheeler 15:52, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Your answer: Nintendo Independent Wiki Alliance It's a part of NIWA. Luna Tiger * the Arc Toraph 16:00, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Super Mario Wiki's Logo is different now. It is sort of like a pic of mario with the words super mario wiki on it and the background it sort of like blurry but looks like the mushroom kingdom. you should go see for yourself in this link-[1]--LilKayKayGal

Do we need NIWA articles?

While I know we are part of the Nintendo Independant Wiki Alliance, but how do our affiliates affect the Pokémon fanbase? The only Pokémon related info on Super Mario Wiki is Super Smash Bros. content. Same goes for Smash Wiki. The other wikis, not so much Pokémon info. These are wikis about other Nintendo franchises. And would a Pokémon fan spend a lot of time on a Zelda Wiki? And these articles don't even talk about Pokémon. So how are they notable? SeanWheeler (talk) 04:25, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

No answer? Hello? I'm still waiting for a response. SeanWheeler (talk) 00:00, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
I agree that they aren't really relevant, and I personally think that the individual articles should redirect to the Nintendo Independent Wiki Alliance article. Histories and other information regarding NIWA wikis are already covered on NintendoWiki, though regarding this article about Super Mario Wiki, there is some information that could be moved on to NintendoWiki, provided that the authors are attributed. I feel that the NIWA article itself should stay, due to Bulbapedia being part of the network and Archaic's involvement in it. --Chickasaurus (talk) 17:50, 3 February 2014 (UTC)