Pokémon Omega Ruby and Alpha Sapphire are coming this November!
Check BNN and Bulbanews for up-to-date Pokémon news and discuss it on the forums or in our IRC channel.
The Bulbapedia mobile skin is currently in open alpha. If you run into any issues using the skin, please report them on the forums.

Talk:Ritchie's Taillow

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search

Should we even have this page? It only appeared in a single episode and is nowhere notable enough. Jmath 18:38, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

I agree with Jmath. It should be made a redirect.--Diby 11:29, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
i also agree i cant even remmeber him having a taillow in tha first place lol Ritchie
I don't know why this page should be removed. I think it's fun there's a page about ritchies Taillow.- unsigned comment from Tommy188 (talkcontribs)
We don't keep pages because they are fun. If they stay or not is based on their notability factor. Jmath 15:10, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
If we have a page on Ritchie's other Pokemon, why can't we have one for Rose? I mean, we have one for Cruise, don't we? --Jonouchi 00:15, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
Which also shouldn't be there. Jmath 14:21, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
Regardless of this, Rose should be a disambig page. I know of Rose (Hoenn) for one, and maybe also Rose Incense? Maybe a few more out there too. — THE TROM — 10:35, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
It mentions the "Kate" thing, too, and since JAPAN IS TEH MOST AWSUM THING EVAR, we'd better list that. I suggest moving this to Rose (Taillow) or something. --((Marton imos)) 10:38, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

I appreciate this page about Rose. It helped me to figure out if there's another appearance of Rose etc. By the way, there are many pages about once-mentioned characters. --Joxer 12:53, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Hmm. . Well, I think it shouldn't be kept. Just because Ash used to have a Taillow, doesn't mean we need Ritchie's article about Rose. Honestly, this page was only created because Ritchie is seen as Ash's opposite. SL-samacontribs 10:51, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
I say that it and Cruise's page should be deleted. There really isn't any reason to have either.
The current vote, including mine, is six for deleting and four against deleting. Does anyone think that's enough? --Galladeon 05:55, 30 May 2009 (UTC)