Please remember to follow the manual of style and code of conduct at all times.
Check and Bulbanews for up-to-date Pokémon news and discuss it on the or in our IRC channel #bulbagarden on irc.systemnet.info.
Some of the info here could be deleted....especially the pics...WAY TOO MUCH! The developers should be somewhere else...whatever...I'm putting it under the . ht14 22:11, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
This seems very much like advertising to me, which is not the purpose of the Bulbapedia, especially considering this site is the kind of thing Nintendo takes legal action against. I wonder if this article is approved by any of the admins. Trainer-c 11:05, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
- I have to agree, but I think the article should be re-written so it doesn't seem like blaitent advertiving *shakes head* I read some of this article earlier and it really does seem like its just advertiving. ~~Takoto タコト| サソデイ = 愛 11:13, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
- I don't think that we even need it its a waste of space but then I don't think that we should have any space for fan sites the hits that they get must be tiny and there's never anything that isn't advertising on them. --lord mada 13:35, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
True. Any better now?
After re-reading the previous version of this entry, I must admit you are right. As one of the PG admins, I apologise for not noticing it earlier today, when I came to know about this entry from one of our members. A few lines in the Pokézine section *did* look like some sort of advertising/recruiting, and I edited them out. I also shortened the part related to the development team, that included a few staff members and other members of the PG team who do not (at this moment in time, at least) directly contribute to the development of the game. A couple of pictures should probably be removed as well (the first and the last, in my humble opinion). Anything else you think needs to be changed? --Viride 13:15, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
- The top one? Definitely for sure be gone with it, at least from a centered spot on the top of the page. It looks like we're actually, you know, SUPPORTING THIS THING and being all "LOOKIE THIS GOOD". I'll fix it. TTEchidna 17:36, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
Thanks a lot. We appreciate your help, and we'll try to keep this from happening again. --Fshy94 07:02, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
Is it just me...
...or do none of the links at the bottom of this page work anymore? Psuamkpukrian 17:19, 02 July 2010 (UTC)