YES, Generation VI is confirmed. PLEASE DO NOT ADD SPECULATION TO PAGES. As soon as information is confirmed by a reliable source, it will be added.
Please remember to follow the manual of style and code of conduct at all times. Check and Bulbanews for up-to-date Pokémon news and discuss it on the or irc channel #bulbapedia.
|Due to special coding in place in the article to illustrate Burmy's forms, certain displays will change showing Burmy as though it had last battled on grassy terrain, therefore wearing its Plant Cloak. This will only affect the Burmy in the evolution box. This changes every day, so when the time comes, click to return to the page and change the display.|
Is it okay if I make a Cheryl's Mothim page? --Theryguy512 13:03, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
- I wouldn't risk it. For one, Cheryl's not an important-enough character in the franchise to get a specific Pokémon article. For two, a Cheryl's Pokémon template would be murder to create! We'd have to include all of the Pokémon she's had over every medium--and when there's a large assortment of Battle Tower Pokémon to include, that's a lot! --Shiningpikablu252 14:09, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
- Don't make it now. Maybe later if she ever reappears in the anime... maybe. TTEchidna 01:34, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
- But it has appeared for three episodes of the anime.................--Theryguy512 01:46, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
It says that Mothim is the one of the only pokémon that is related to another with form differences. Shouldn't it have a sub-header that says it is the only one that is the evolved form of a pokémon with form differences? - unsigned comment from Joshsauce (talk • contribs)
The Trivia section states, that of the four moth-based Pokémon, it is the only one which is part Flying-type. Then it mentions that Masquerain could be also based on a moth. However, it is clear that Masquerain at least draws inspiration from moths, as it's japanese Name is アメモース (Amemoth), making this section pointless.