Talk:List of items in other languages
Why are some items linked and others not? (MathijsP 12:35, 3 June 2008 (UTC))
- Because some have articles, while others do not. --Maxim 12:40, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
This list = fail
This list = still fail
Even moar fail
As you can see, the headers in this lists are screwed up. Pictures are listed under "English", English names are listed under "Kana", Kana is listed under "Romaji" etc. There are two solutions to that problem: either delete the pictures or make a new template (with a header "Picture", which would be used specifically for this page). I prefer the second solution but I'm not able to do it myself. --Maxim 13:31, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
- Did it! Wasn't as hard as I thought. --Maxim 13:54, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
Notes on out-dated info to check later
The Battle Items section is out of date.
X Special has been X Sp. Atk since ? Check list of items by index number by generation to see when changed. Will need translations of X Spec. Atk in the other languages.
X Defend is now X Defense also. These were both changed in Generation VI.
None of the wonder launcher items are listed at all, but Hoenn items have been updated. Someone skipped a generation, I guess.
None of the abbreviations for the languages in this section are tagged to give the word that they stand for as they are in the above sections. Accented e is used in one French term (Def. Spé.), but not the others?
Note missing on Devon Parts to document that these were called Devon Goods in Generation III.
Noticed these too late to fix now. Getting tired. Will fix later, if no one else has done it by then. I can only fix English entries. Have no idea if other languages were changed or to what. No way for me to check.
Well, I just tried to update the item names of X Defense and X Sp. Atk. I couldn’t figure out how to change the names and add a tool tip without screwing up the icon and having code show instead of changed text.
X Sp. Atk*
The above *looks* correct, but it doesn’t work. Guess I’ll just leave it to the experts and just confine my contributions to fixing typos in the text. 8-\ White Phoenix (talk) 16:28, 25 January 2015 (UTC) Yeah, fine. The code works correctly here.