Talk:List of Pokémon with unique base stat totals

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search

VERY random question

Is there a Pokémon with a base stat total of 666?--Jachi 12:49, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

No. Kyurem comes closest, though, with 660. - unsigned comment from Missingno. Master (talkcontribs) 13:04, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
Actually Kyogre, Groudon, Slaking and Regigigas all come closer, with 670, four points more, while Kyurem has six less. Marked +-+-+ 16:48, 31 August 2011 (UTC)


Well, I hate the category, but like the list. I think the category should be deleted. Mewo 07:03, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Why? The category serves the purpose much better than the list. --SnorlaxMonster 15:07, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
The category will not be deleted as it also shows up on the species pages. The question is whether this list, which is basically the category with a different layout, except it doesn't auto-update, should be kept in addition or deleted. Werdnae (talk) 00:18, 11 May 2012 (UTC)


Since this still hasn't been deleted, I'm voicing my opinion. If you look at the category, they are listed in alphabetical order. Base stat totals are numbers. I disagree with deletion of this page. --Abcboy (talk) 05:23, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

I agree with both of these arguments against deletion and believe it should be considered that we have arrived at a consensus. Kanjo (talk) 16:28, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

I like it.

I like it because you can sort it by Pokedex number, alphabetical order (and reversed), and total stats lowest to highest and vice versa. I don't really think it should be deleted. It's not hurting anyone.

 EmpoleonMan (talk) 13:00, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

I like having this page because it is in order, with everything shown right there. I also agree with you, EmpoleonMan, in that this list can be sorted and no one is being harmed by this. Leafeon007 (talk) 01:58, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Mega Evolved Pokémon

Are we allowed to include any Mega Evolved Pokémon with unique BST trivia in their own pages or no? --Cinday123 (Talk) 10:35, 6 May 2014 (UTC)