Please remember to follow the manual of style and code of conduct at all times.
Check and Bulbanews for up-to-date Pokémon news and discuss it on the or in our IRC channel #bulbagarden on irc.systemnet.info.
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Shouldn't this be deleted? It's a pointless article about a Pokémon who was owned for less then an episode. --Netto-kun 22:56, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- Well Ash's Raticate has its own page and he had it less then one episode. Basically, it's okay to right a pointless article about a Pokémon as long as a main character owned it. Not my rules but that's the way it is. --☆ケンジガール 04:59, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Um, your point? Are you saying this should be mentioned in the article or should this article be deleted??~Pokemaniac102 02:31, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
- That's barely a reason to keep it. It's minimal appearance does not warrent an entire article. --FabuVinny |Talk Page| 14:07, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
- YES, IT DOES! Don't you get it? If a Pokémon is owned by a main character, then it warrants its own article! The fact that a main character owned it, no matter how briefly, makes it notable! I'm Missingno. Master, and I approve this message. 14:24, 14 July 2008 (UTC)