Our 2014 Christmas Contests have begun! Check the Bulbagarden Forums to find out how you could win 1 of 30 copies of ORAS!
Please remember to follow the manual of style and code of conduct at all times.
Check BNN and Bulbanews for up-to-date Pokémon news and discuss it on the forums or in our IRC channel #bulbagarden on irc.systemnet.info.

Talk:Gigaremo units

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search

wut

"Furthermore, the player's partner Pokémon is unable to destroy the black Gigaremos, despite having the correct field move." 'None' symbolizes that you cannot destroy it, so why is it considered an actual move in this case? --Si6x12 23:49, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

I never noticed that was there. You're right, "None" isn't a field move. Given that "None" being a field move was the basis for the entire trivia section, I've just killed the whole thing. Werdnae (talk) 00:24, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Capitilization

There is an inconsistency here. "Gigaremo units" has "units" lowercase, while "Miniremo Units" has it uppercase. Which is correct? --SnorlaxMonster 11:58, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

According to the edit history, the game has "Gigaremo units" without capitalisation. That said, I'm not sure we need the "units" at all. IIRC, they're more commonly referred to as just "Gigaremo" and "Miniremo". Werdnae (talk) 18:39, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
I support a potential move to just Gigaremo and Miniremo, there were numerous times when they were used without the units, and others where they were called machines in place of units. I didn't notice the change in capitalisation when I was fixing the links, sorry. --Spriteit 02:56, 6 February 2012 (UTC)