Talk:Clefable (Jungle 1)

This is ridiculous and silly. There do not need to be separate articles for all of these. -Happy Mask Man 07:54, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

There's reason enough. There are non-Holo equivalents which were created just for the English sets. There are Holos versus non-Holos in certain decks. They are sorted in lists differently, they appear less frequently, and if we can get a good source for their sell data and regularly update the articles with them, those would be notably different as well. As Bulbapedia's main content expands, it allows room for articles of less significance; if we can expand the item section more, for example, we can afford articles for individual items; as we've expanded the anime section, we've made room for less significant characters. The holo card is significantly separate. --Pie ^~♪♫ 08:07, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

I disagree. This particular pair of cards are the exactly the same except for the hologram. Therefore these articles should be merged. - 振霖_T 11:25, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

I agree with Zhen. The cards are the same, it's not like we can't put the price data on one page for separate holo/non-holo versions... A reprint is what we should debate about having separate articles on... *late reply* TTEchidna 03:22, 29 August 2007 (UTC)