User talk:Venomoth

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search

I hate forums so much right now. (իէħէհ)

*Ɣℯⲛօӎօṫհ* 07:31, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Blanking

Please do not blank pages. --PAK Man Talk 20:16, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

I was referring to the Favorite template. At one point, you removed all the content from the page. I do, however, appreciate that you fixed the template instead of just leaving it blank. Just for reference, if you make a mistake, there is an undo button you can click on. --PAK Man Talk 21:26, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

If Venomoth is your second favorite, what's your favorite? --悪臭の人File:212MS.gif stinkoman20X6normal.PNG 21:46, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Re: Query

The people who made edits after the first one did not change the box. They changed categories, etc. If you want to change the picture, just put {{User Blah|NUMBER}} when you put it on your userpage. If you want to change the colour, you will have to copy the whole code. Porygon-Z 18:43, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

If I might add, the main reason people shouldn't edit those boxes is because so many other users already use them. Changing colors may be a simple thing, but unless all/most of the other people using the box agree with the change, it's not really fair to just edit it. You'd end up with users fighting over which color it should be. Better to leave suggestions on the talk pages, like you did on a few of them. :D -- Jïörüjï Ðērākō.>.cнаt^ 22:40, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
True, but still... --Venomoth 18:54, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Template:ElementalTypes

The template is divided by physical and special columns based on how the attacks went prior to Generation IV. Your edits basically made it look like Dark-type attacks were physical and Ghost-type attacks were special prior to the split when, in fact, the reverse is true (Ghost was physical, Dark was special). As such, your edits to that template constitute vandalism. Please don't do it again. --Shiningpikablu252 20:38, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Updates should show how it is now, not how it was. How can this be vandalism? --*Ɣℯⲛօӎօṫհ* 21:20, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
It's vandalism because you were inserting false information. The reason the template is like that is because that's how attacks worked in Generation III and before, before the physical/special split in Generation IV rendered the type-based attack classification categories obsolete. Someone screwing up and making every Dark-type attack except one physical in Generation IV does not change the fact Dark-type attacks were special in Generation III.
If your "how it is now" philosophy WERE to be applied to that template, the correct action would be eliminating the columns, since "how it is now" is physical and special not even depending on type. You had zero reason to make those edits the way you did.
Please leave this subject matter alone before you end up blocked. --Shiningpikablu252 21:29, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Tell you what, block me! I won't be back. --*Ɣℯⲛօӎօṫհ* 21:38, 17 April 2008 (UTC)