User talk:Raijinili: Difference between revisions

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→‎Links: new section)
(→‎Links: thanks)
Line 17: Line 17:


done. was going to do them myself yesterday but something came up. thanks for doing them. -- '''[[User:MAGNEDETH|<span style="color:#000033;">MAG</span>]][[User:MAGNEDETH#Interesting Stuff|<span style="color:#696969;">NE</span>]][[User talk:MAGNEDETH|<span style="color:#000033;">DETH</span>]]''' 05:20, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
done. was going to do them myself yesterday but something came up. thanks for doing them. -- '''[[User:MAGNEDETH|<span style="color:#000033;">MAG</span>]][[User:MAGNEDETH#Interesting Stuff|<span style="color:#696969;">NE</span>]][[User talk:MAGNEDETH|<span style="color:#000033;">DETH</span>]]''' 05:20, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
:Actually, they were [http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ATTEchidna&diff=521494&oldid=521474 done six days ago]. I just needed an admin to edit them in, since they were protected. Thanks. --[[User:Raijinili|Raijinili]] 05:47, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:47, 29 October 2008

Please use the link templates. - 振霖T 11:52, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Go here. --PAK Man Talk 16:08, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Aura's Lucario ("PCG-P" Promo 92)

It's been long since decided that a calculation like that on the Bone Rush attack is not notable for the article. Do we state that Geodude from Fossil's average attack damage is 10 in a separate section? No, we don't, because attack calculations are not notable unless they have a major impact on the game (such as a format ban). The attack on the Lucario in question is very similar, only with a higher base damage. If we were to keep the section you've been insistent on adding onto this card article, we'd have to add that section onto ALL cards with damaging attacks and state their average damages. If we were to put down that Wooper from EX Unseen Forces had an average damage of 10 for its first attack and 20 for its second in a completely separate section, that would make things confusing indeed.

Case in point: That section you're insistent on adding is completely unnecessary. Please don't put that section back onto that article or any other article, or else you may find yourself on the outside looking in. --Shiningpikablu252 15:29, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Shhh

Shhh, everyone's sleeping...--Tavisource 06:25, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

I'm sure the admins know what they're doing; I'm not sure where, but if you would like a page regarding things like that, I can't stop you...go ahead...add me to the support list.--Tavisource 05:19, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Links

done. was going to do them myself yesterday but something came up. thanks for doing them. -- MAGNEDETH 05:20, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Actually, they were done six days ago. I just needed an admin to edit them in, since they were protected. Thanks. --Raijinili 05:47, 29 October 2008 (UTC)