User talk:Missingno. Master/Archive2

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
< User talk:Missingno. Master
Revision as of 17:56, 23 July 2009 by Maverick Nate (talk | contribs) (Protected "User talk:Missingno. Master/Archive2": archives get protected ([edit=sysop] (indefinite) [move=sysop] (indefinite)))
Jump to navigationJump to search

NOTICE: This page is an archive of Missingno. Master's talk page. All discussion is to be held on his current talk page.

The Order of the Glitch

Whoa. Talk about an obsession to glitch pokemon. And who would have thought that Pokemaniac was a type for glitch pokemon?! RIGHTEOUS!!486PokeManiac102492 21:18, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Sig

Would you like your sig to be smaller yet with everything in it?486PokeManiac102492 03:05, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Yes. PLEASE make it NOT A FRICKIN' TABLE. TTEchidnaFire echyGSDS! 03:59, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Once we decide on a signature policy that we're making on the forums, your sig will be in violation of it! --155476Theryguy512473File:Trozeiani025.gif 11:49, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
I'm starting to get the impression that you all hate my sig. Very well, if it can really be made smaller, yet with all its current content, please, by all means, have at it.
Glitch Pokémon and Official Pokémon

There is no real difference between the two. In my opinion, the two should be considered equal!

000.png

11:51, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

I would appreciate it if you would change it, I could lend you the code for the rollover...Optimatum♏Talk|Hi 11:52, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Alright, alright, maybe I will change it. -- Glitch and Official Pokémon. There is no real difference between the two. In my opinion, the two should be considered equal!-- quoted by Missingno. Master 20:06, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Woah, woah, wait a second! Who did this?! -- Glitch and Official Pokémon. There is no real difference between the two. In my opinion, the two should be considered equal!-- quoted by Missingno. Master 20:08, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Sig

How's the new sig?486PokeManiac102492 21:06, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

For the last time, STOP!

Dude, for the last time, we agreed that Missigno. DID NOT appear in the anime! If you keep on putting that in, Tina and I will tell the admins. --Theryguy512 20:47, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

It's always you and Tina. The Admins will always know. And I'm with Missingno. Master again.486PokeManiac102492 20:48, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

...............No comment................--Theryguy512 20:50, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Missingno. Master, what you're doing is considered vandalism. Please stop! --Theryguy512 20:52, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

When was this agreement that Missingno. wasn't in the anime? We don't know what goes through the writers' minds! For all we know, Missingno. could've appeared in the anime! And it is not vandalism! How is putting in a perfectly plausible piece of information vandalism? -- Glitch and Official Pokémon. There is no real difference between the two. In my opinion, the two should be considered equal!-- quoted by Missingno. Master 20:54, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

I'm with Ry now. That's kinda vandalism since it is only speculation.486PokeManiac102492 20:55, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
Missingno. did not appear in the anime, mainly because Missingno. is NOT A REAL POKÉMON. Yes, there's Venutoise and all that sh*t, but Missingno. is not a real Pokémon from the games. It's a glitch. It's filler data. Why would it be in the anime. Tina δ 20:58, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
Can you prove it?!!!?! Are you absolutely sure???!!!?486PokeManiac102492 20:59, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Because the writers can do anything they feel like. If they want to put a Glitch Pokémon in the anime, who's to stop them? -- Glitch and Official Pokémon. There is no real difference between the two. In my opinion, the two should be considered equal!-- quoted by Missingno. Master 21:00, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Missingno. never appeared in the anime, what kind of nonsense is that. It's impossible for something that doesn't really exist to be in the anime. -Sketchies 21:17, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Uh, it IS possible. The writers could make two plus two equal fish if they wanted to! They decide what goes. -- Glitch and Official Pokémon. There is no real difference between the two. In my opinion, the two should be considered equal!-- quoted by Missingno. Master 21:19, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Until that happens. It stays off this encyclopedia. Is that understood? -Sketchies 21:20, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
Ow that's harsh. I guess you can't edit for a long while.486PokeManiac102492 21:20, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
Alright, alright. And I can still edit, Pokemanic102. He didn't block me, just made his point, inescapably clearly. --

Glitch and Official Pokémon. There is no real difference between the two. In my opinion, the two should be considered equal!-- quoted by Missingno. Master 21:22, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Oh... Okay!486PokeManiac102492 21:23, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Phione

Who are you to define what is Legendary and what is not? Leave the template alone and discuss it on the talk page. Well...you have no choice in leaving it alone as it's protected. -Sketchies 15:32, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Adding to Sketchies comment, Phione IS a baby Pokémon. --Theryguy512 15:35, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

NO, it's NOT! Baby Pokémon need only meet 2 criteria: Must evolve into parent Pokémon, and cannot breed. Phione meets neither of these requirements, so it can't possibly be a baby Pokémon. And who says Phione is legendary? Just because it can be bred from one doesn't mean it IS one! -- Glitch and Official Pokémon. There is no real difference between the two. In my opinion, the two should be considered equal!-- quoted by Missingno. Master 15:51, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Excuse me, but Phione can't breed! Can they??? --Theryguy512 15:52, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Yes, they can! They most certainly can! Phione can breed with Ditto to create more Phione. -- Glitch and Official Pokémon. There is no real difference between the two. In my opinion, the two should be considered equal!-- quoted by Missingno. Master 15:53, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Shinies

Where the hell did you get so many?! @_@ Half of them aren't available through the Pokéradar... which is probably the easiest way to get shinies... Tina δ 20:25, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Either pure luck, or just a little help... |-| . |-| TESHIGIGAS RAWR!! 20:31, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
It's something called 'messing with glitches' my dear...>.>;;;Ph34r4everTalk page11:35 9 Feb 2008 11:35, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

No, it's something called luck. -- Glitch Pokémon. Official Pokémon. There is no real difference between the two. In my opinion, the two should be considered equal!-- quoted by Missingno. Master 12:34, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh, right. As if getting so many was easy...493OptimatumTalk|09:43 11 Mar 2008

Seriously Dude, Stop!

Dude, leave the glitch pages' titles alone. They are NOT to be moved to Example (Glitch Pokémon), they are fine as they are. Also, the GP template you made is not needed. Thank you. --Theryguy512 00:34, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Phione is legendary!

Hey, I found proof that Phione is legendary! It can be found http://www.pokemon.com/#mailbag_02042008 . Its a little strange that both our proofs are from the mailbag, yet have different responses....--Theryguy512 21:49, 5 February 2008 (UTC) Yeah, I know. It's actually the same mailbag, same question, but they just changed their answer. -- Glitch Pokémon. Official Pokémon. There is no real difference between the two. In my opinion, the two should be considered equal!-- quoted by Missingno. Master 21:51, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Wait

Doesn't having al of those glitch pokemon mess up your game?493C 491 Is426for Cookie473

No, they don't. The ONLY adverse effect of them is screwing up your Hall of Fame data so it displays random Pokemon and Glitch Pokemon at random levels, with odd cries and music. And even then, I find it entertaining. I really wish people would stop believing the myths that Glitch Pokemon are bad for your game. --

Glitch Pokémon. Official Pokémon. There is no real difference between the two. In my opinion, the two should be considered equal!-- quoted by Missingno. Master 12:02, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Celebi on Route 123???

Do you have any proof of this Celebi Glitch??? --Theryguy512 14:02, 15 March 2008 (UTC) Funny you should ask. I currently put out a notice on the Missingno. Master forums, asking for glitch researchers to give proof (I know that there are some who have found evidence of the glitch, those are who I'm trying to contact). Hopefully, once this evidence is brought to light, this'll stop people from not believing in the glitch. BTW, to my understanding, it's only in early versions of US's R/S. And I pre-ordered mine, hence the Celebi I got in Sapphire. -- Glitch Pokémon. Official Pokémon. There is no real difference between the two. In my opinion, the two should be considered equal!-- quoted by Missingno. Master 14:06, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

serebii.net has already debunked all possibilities of such a glitch existing. It's safe to say that there's no such thing as a Celebi Glitch. --Shiningpikablu252 17:57, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRGH! The one thing I HATE more than ANYTHING is people trying to cite proof that there is no Celebi Glitch by referring to Serebii.net! They never disproved it, Serebii just refuses to believe in it! They've debunked nothing! Nothing, I tell you! They just want to seem on top of the situation, so they're falsely claiming that it doesn't exist. Also, you must realize that Serebii.net, however good it is, absolutely bombs out when it comes to glitches. That page there is my least favorite part of Serebii.net. -- Glitch Pokémon. Official Pokémon. There is no real difference between the two. In my opinion, the two should be considered equal!-- quoted by Missingno. Master 11:01, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Even so, GLITCH. IS. NOT. OFFICIAL. WAY. TO. GET. CELEBI. BECAUSE. IT. IS. NOT. AVAILABLE. IN. SOME. R/S. GAMES. 493OptimatumTalk|12:32 16 Mar 2008
That's beside the point. It is still possible to get it, hence you say: (Only in early R/S games), or something like that. GlinnFile:Ani202MS.gif 13:20, 16 March 2008 (UTC)