User talk:MarkQuest

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Revision as of 04:33, 30 July 2015 by Force Fire (talk | contribs) (→‎Talk page discussions: new section)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search
Welcome to Bulbapedia, MarkQuest!
Bulbapedia bulb.png

By creating your account you are now able to edit pages, join discussions, and expand the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia. Before you jump in, here are some ground rules:

  • Be nice to everyone. It's in the code of conduct.
  • Make good edits. Preview them before you save to make sure they're perfect the first time around.
  • Use wikicode and link templates when adding content to a page.
  • Use proper grammar and spelling, and read the manual of style.
  • You can't create a userpage until you've added to the encyclopedia. It's a privilege. See the userspace policy.
  • Use talk pages to resolve editing disputes. Don't "edit war," or constantly re-edit/undo the same thing on a page.
  • If you have a question about something, be proactive. Take a look at our FAQ. If you're still stuck, ask for help. The staff won't bite.
  • Sign all talk page posts with four tildes (~~~~). This will turn into your name and the time you wrote the comment.
  • For more handy links, see the welcome portal.
Thank you, and have a good time editing here!
  Tyler53841 (talk) 13:37, 18 July 2015 (UTC)  
 

Edit warring

It is not proper to repeatedly revert an edit of yours that keeps getting undone (especially when someone tries to directly cite policy to you). This is called edit warring. The appropriate thing to do is discuss it on an appropriate talk page. (In this case, since it was already about a talk page, you could have gone to Glik's talk page.) Please remember this in the future. Thanks. Tiddlywinks (talk) 03:22, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Talk page discussions

Hello, you might be wondering why your comment keeps getting removed. Well, as per Talk page policy you may not reply to a comment that is over 6 months old as either the discussion has been resolved or the user that asked the question may no longer be around to see the response (rendering the response pointless). In your case, it is the former, as the question has already been answered. If you do have further inquiries about it, you can simply create a new section. Thank you.--ForceFire 04:33, 30 July 2015 (UTC)