User talk:J-J-M
List of archives:
Um....
...Any particular reason you removed all the information I put on the Shellder article about Marilyn's Shellder? I was under the impression that articles need more information, not less. And why change the caption? That WAS Marilyn's Shellder, was it not? Missingno. Master wants YOU! Join the Order of the Glitch! (my talk page) 22:30, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
- All of that information could've been added to the synopsis section.... And about the caption, she is a COTD anyway, so basically unimportant in the long run. J-J-M 22:34, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
DP150 screenshot
This was TTE's edit summary when he first added the image. "Even if this screenshot's from DP151 or something, we need to use it." Stop removing it. It can always be removed if it's proved not to be from the episode. --ケンジのガール 22:20, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
WTH indeed
care to explain? --electAbuzzzz 11:16, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
- It's a summary for the episode from Newtype. I just said that because the info was ridiculous. But since it's from a credible source, it can be trusted. J-J-M 20:54, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
Removing content from articles
Listen. In case you didn't know, I am the leader of Project Anime and I do what sees fit. Got that? I'm sick of having these confrontations with you. I wish that you would respect my authority. Saying an article shouldn't be expanded makes no sense at all. It was useful information. So leave it alone and let it go please. --ケンジのガール 21:58, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
Knock it off
Stop changing Brandon's Regis to "At Snowpoint Temple". You have no proof that Brandon is going to leave them there. Until it's confirmed that he will leave them there, they are still in his party. I don't want to have to undo you again. This is your final warning. --ケンジのガール 06:23, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
Erika's Gloom
don't redirect these sort of articles without cheking with us first. There's been a lot of debate regarding each article. You can't make these decisions on your own. --electAbuzzzz 21:51, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
- Okay then. Sorry about that. J-J-M 22:23, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
- No worries. Next time, just slap on a
{{Questionable Notability}}
notice on it and start a discussion. --electAbuzzzz 22:51, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
- No worries. Next time, just slap on a