User talk:AstroACE: Difference between revisions

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
(→‎Edit warring: new section)
Line 60: Line 60:


[[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 20:23, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
[[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 20:23, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
== Edit warring ==
If a user undoes your edit, please don't add it back without bringing it to the page's talk page first. Constantly adding it back is edit warring, which is a blockable offense. [[User:Berrenta|Berrenta]] ([[User talk:Berrenta|talk]]) 20:27, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:27, 2 August 2016

Welcome

Bulbapedia logo.png
Welcome to Bulbapedia, AstroACE!

Here are a few links to help you get started:

The Manual of Style, or MoS, outlines the format of all pages on Bulbapedia.

All of our administrators are here to help! Talk to them if you have any questions or problems with Bulbapedia.

On talk pages, please sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~), or by using the "Your signature with a timestamp" (button_sig.png) button at the top of the edit window.

The Userspace Policy says that you should keep userspace edits (edits to User:AstroACE) to a minimum, and outlines a few other guidelines for your userspace.

For a complete list of policies and editing advice, please see the Welcome Portal.
 Thank you, and have a good time editing here!
  Mudkipluvr4ever 20:17, 2 April 2010 (UTC)  
 

Edit warring

Please try not to engage in edit warring. This is the practice of continually reverting or re-editing something that someone else has reverted or changed. The preferred response when you disagree with another person is to start a discussion on the talk page for the page in question or for the user you disagree with (like below), instead of trying to argue it out in the edit summary.

Please try to keep this in mind in the future. Thanks. Tiddlywinks (talk) 20:23, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Hoenn Route 110 Grunt

Let me start with, if it really is the only instance in the games where there's been a thought bubble, then that needs to be the thrust of your trivia point. That's what would make it notable...maybe. Right now, though, your wording did not include this at all.

That said, I'm really not sure at the moment that that's the only time a thought bubble was seen. Even if it was, however, I'm of the opinion it's still not a notable occurence. I'll bring it up with other staff, but for the moment I'll leave it be rather than continue with more reversions.

I'd also like to make an additional note here: please keep the code of conduct in mind: "Be nice". In your edit summary, "Suggest looking up the definition of could" isn't exactly nice.

(In case you may have missed it, please be sure to read the other message above as well.)

Tiddlywinks (talk) 20:23, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Edit warring

If a user undoes your edit, please don't add it back without bringing it to the page's talk page first. Constantly adding it back is edit warring, which is a blockable offense. Berrenta (talk) 20:27, 2 August 2016 (UTC)