User talk:Adil/Archive 3

• Archive #01: Oct 2008 - April 2010

• Archive #02: April 2010 - April 2011

Re: Relative

The original poster posted saying something, then someone else posted saying that he was wrong, my post was agreeing with the original poster, how is agreeing with the original poster not relative? I mean I can see why you deleted everything after my first post because someone misunderstood my post and I had to clarify but how is my first post which is on topic and about what the conversation is, not relative? felinoel 12:37, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

If you didn't notice, that conversation ended 4 and a half months ago. As far as the original poster is concerned, Ataro cleared it up and replied already and the discussion ended there. Along with that, the reference that you gave, was not relative to the article but rather it was a personal comment or opinion regarding a noodle, how does that help improving an article? Talk pages are for discussing how to improve an article. Please have a look at our talk page policy and kindly give it a thorough reading. It says:

『Please check the dates of a discussion before you reply to it. Unless there a is good reason for revitalizing an old conversation, comments on sections older than six months old will be removed. This is because by this point the problems cited will have been cleared up.』

The six months has been given here just in case if the case/dispute/issue has not been resolved till that time, which was clearly not the case here. So, please take care of it in the future, have a nice day. ♫♪エイディニズ♪♫ 15:11, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Misinformation causing a discussion to end does not clear up the issue? The noodle in question was what the discussion was about, whether or not it pertains to the article well enough is not up to me to decide, the original poster obviously felt that the article would be improved with information about noodles otherwise they wouldn't have posted about it? felinoel 15:34, 1 May 2011 (UTC)