Template talk:Shipping redirect: Difference between revisions
ArcToraphim (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
I've noticed that we have this on some Shipping articles, but not others. Should we do something about this? [[User:Flyingtypefan|Flyingtypefan]] 03:28, 24 July 2010 (UTC) | I've noticed that we have this on some Shipping articles, but not others. Should we do something about this? [[User:Flyingtypefan|Flyingtypefan]] 03:28, 24 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
:Find the ones that are missing it, and add it? It's a simple solution. Which 'ships have you seen without? [[User:ArcToraphim|Luna Tiger]] * [[User talk:ArcToraphim|the Arc Toraph]] 03:37, 24 July 2010 (UTC) | :Find the ones that are missing it, and add it? It's a simple solution. Which 'ships have you seen without? [[User:ArcToraphim|Luna Tiger]] * [[User talk:ArcToraphim|the Arc Toraph]] 03:37, 24 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
I was just asking because i wouldn't want to put all that work into adding it to those pages only to find out i shouldn't have done that and have it reverted, which would also create unneeded work for whoever had to revert all of them. I'll go add it now. [[User:Flyingtypefan|Flyingtypefan]] 03:42, 24 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:42, 24 July 2010
Why don't we use {{PAGENAME}} where {{{1}}} is currently? We won't have to put {{shipping redirect|whatever}} but only {{shipping redirect}} in the article! The ZAPD0S_master 02:53, 26 March 2006 (CST)
Edit request
I think "click here" should lead to the shipping article. Can an admin add that? - unsigned comment from CuboneKing (talk • contribs)
Inconsistency
I've noticed that we have this on some Shipping articles, but not others. Should we do something about this? Flyingtypefan 03:28, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
- Find the ones that are missing it, and add it? It's a simple solution. Which 'ships have you seen without? Luna Tiger * the Arc Toraph 03:37, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
I was just asking because i wouldn't want to put all that work into adding it to those pages only to find out i shouldn't have done that and have it reverted, which would also create unneeded work for whoever had to revert all of them. I'll go add it now. Flyingtypefan 03:42, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
