Template talk:ItemInfobox/head

Comments

IIRC the rest of the site generally lists chronologically, not reverse-chronologically. Therefore your item listings going from the most recent generation to the first seems odd. I understand why you've done it that way (or at least I can make a case for it) but I think that with the way everything else is set up, people looking for the most recent information will automatically scan to the bottom of the table. —darklordtrom 10:31, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Oh, I only just noticed this comment. I suppose that is a good point; the rest of the page is sorted chronologically as well (with item descriptions and item locations). I think I will flip it. --SnorlaxMonster 13:27, 23 April 2013 (UTC)