Template:Main Page/Message from the Editor: Difference between revisions

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
(It's been a hell of a ride folks.)
m (New message!)
(17 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{|
{|
! text align="left" valign="bottom" style="font-size: 150%; font-weight: 200;" | December 9
! style="text-align:left; vertical-align:bottom; font-size: 150%; font-weight: 200;" | September 6
|<span style="float:right">{{ani|{{MftE}}}}</span>
|<span style="float:right">{{ani|{{MftE}}}}</span>
|-
|-
| colspan="2" |
| colspan="2" |
----
----
On December 9th, 2007 at 22:04 (10:04 pm), I joined Bulbapedia. Two minutes later, I made my first edit. <span class="plainlinks">[http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=User:MAGNEDETH&diff=prev&oldid=249878 It was terrible]</span>. How did such a hopeless new user end up as the leader of the site? By following in the shoes of my superiors, getting support from my fellow users, and a whole lot of editing. I managed to work my way up but I never thought I would reach the highest level. Sure, I had aspirations to become an administrator, maybe even a bureaucrat, but that's the highest I was going to attain, right?


In December 2010, TTEchidna was relieved of his duty, and I took his place as {{bp|Editor-in-Chief}} of Bulbapedia. Before he left, he put in place a rule that all EiC's would stay in position for a maximum of two years. When I had heard of this, I scoffed at the premise that I would have to unwillingly relinquish my position because HE couldn't go two years without going crazy. I said a few times that I would decide if I were going to go more than two and veto that rule if I wanted to. I am officially removing that rule.
Effective immediately, new requirements regarding the use of four templates that are extremely important to the continued improvement of Bulbapedia have been mandated:


It has been two years. I have not gone crazy and I feel as though there's still plenty left to do. However, I also feel like I can't devote the amount of time to the site I would like to. That is why I have decided to voluntarily release my position as Editor-in-Chief of Bulbapedia. While most people leave the staff because they feel their interest in Pokémon has waned, my interest in Pokémon was never even close to that of my fellow users and staffers, but that didn't stop me because I wasn't really in it for Pokémon. Yea, I like playing the games, but I grew to enjoy editing, and being around the staff that I grew to call my friends. To me, Pokémon was the subject and keeping tabs on it was the job. As with any job I've had, I did it to the best of my abilities, and life went on. These reasons are why that, despite my position departure, I will not be leaving the site entirely. I will accept the move to {{bp|Executive Policymaker}} and Vice-Webmaster and continue to work on various projects. The main difference will just be a little less time spent on the site, and a little more time spent focusing on my real life activities.
:''When using the templates {{template|Split}}, {{template|Merge}}, {{template|Move}}, and {{template|DiscussDelete}} to nominate articles for administrative action, a section outlining the rationale for the nomination '''must''' be added to the article's talk page. Nominations lacking an outlined rationale will no longer be considered.''
 
In my place will be my Deputy, {{u|Werdnae}}. There were days where I felt I paled in comparison to the jobs Werdnae was able to accomplish. When I took over and appointed Trom as my Deputy, he warned me that it was highly unlikely he would last long enough to be the next EiC, and he was right. Initially I was worried I wouldn't be able to find someone with that specific something I was looking for to take my place, but the answer was right in front of me. When Werdnae joined, he brought maturity and efficiency to the table. I noticed how quickly and efficiently he worked his way up the ladder and knew he was destined for success. When I joined, I had neither, so that alone lets you know the kind of guy Werdnae is.
 
It's at this point that I should list those who I am thankful for, but the thing is, I can't fit everyone in here. The entire Bulbagarden staff, both past and present, I have considered my friends. I'm also not leaving, and in the short term, my activity probably won't change much. That being said, thank you to everyone, but we ain't done yet. However, there is one person I have a special message for:
Werdnae, good luck.
 
Sincerely,<br>
{{u|MAGNEDETH}}<br>
Former Editor-in-Chief of Bulbapedia


An outlined rationale helps to expedite administrative action, and helps to prevent confusion and misunderstandings that can result in mistakes. Keep in mind, the staff aren't mind readers, and not every nomination reason is obvious.
<p style="text-align:right; font-size:85%;"> [[Bulbapedia:Messages from the Editor|Browse previous messages]]</p>
<p style="text-align:right; font-size:85%;"> [[Bulbapedia:Messages from the Editor|Browse previous messages]]</p>
<!--Please do not sign the MftE, as it is supposed to be a decision representative of the consensus of the entire editorial staff and not just an individual editor. However, do not forget to update Template:MftE with your icon. -->
<!--Please do not sign the MftE, as it is supposed to be a decision representative of the consensus of the entire editorial staff and not just an individual editor. However, do not forget to update Template:MftE with your icon. -->
<!-- Please do not remove that last line -->
<!-- Please do not remove that last line -->
|}<noinclude>[[Category:Main Page components]]</noinclude>
|}<noinclude>[[Category:Main Page components]]</noinclude>

Revision as of 06:45, 6 September 2015

September 6 043

Effective immediately, new requirements regarding the use of four templates that are extremely important to the continued improvement of Bulbapedia have been mandated:

When using the templates {{Split}}, {{Merge}}, {{Move}}, and {{DiscussDelete}} to nominate articles for administrative action, a section outlining the rationale for the nomination must be added to the article's talk page. Nominations lacking an outlined rationale will no longer be considered.

An outlined rationale helps to expedite administrative action, and helps to prevent confusion and misunderstandings that can result in mistakes. Keep in mind, the staff aren't mind readers, and not every nomination reason is obvious.

Browse previous messages