Talk:Synchronoise (move)

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Revision as of 01:44, 15 June 2011 by TheChrisD (Talk | contribs) (By same type, what does it mean?)

Jump to: navigation, search

By same type, what does it mean?

For example, would a Symbolar using this move damage only a Xatu and Lugia on the field, as well as itself, or would it damage Girafarig and Chatot as well? TTEchidna 07:31, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

I would assume it would hit any 'mon that shares a type with the user, but this will definitely need spading... TheChrisD RantsEdits 21:10, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
Well, it's taken a while for me to figure this out; but a Sigilyph using Synchronoise will hit any Pokémon that is either part-Psychic or part-Flying. TheChrisD RantsEdits 11:14, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
Interesting thing here. An opponent Beheeyem used Synchronoise on me, hurt my Lugia, but left my Latias untouched. Makes me wonder, if a Sigilyph used it, would it hurt Tornadus and Latias, only one of them, or both of them? TTEchidna 05:48, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
Hmmm, I never tested it in anything other than singles, so I can't really say. Unless the order of typing matters, which would make sense given my test with Sigilyph against Unfezant. TheChrisD RantsEdits 01:44, 15 June 2011 (UTC)


If an Umbreon uses the move, then does it have any effect? TorchicBlaziken (talkedits) 22:47, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

No, unless the target has a Bull's Eye or something. Pikiwyn talk 22:55, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
What about if, in a double/triple battle, Miracle Eye is used on Umbreon's target by its partner (eg. Kadabra), which allows it to be hit by Psychic-type moves? Will Synchro Noise do damage then? H4r8z0r 04:36, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Wrongly Categorised?

I feel I should ask here since I've never encountered this ingame, But the article seems to suggest that it shouldn't be classified under swipe moves as it only hits once. Can someone confirm this for me? ContraOmega 20:33, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Definitely shouldn't be in that category. Looks like it was a copypaste error when the article was created. I've removed the category. Thanks for pointing it out. Werdnae (talk) 20:40, 23 May 2011 (UTC)