Talk:Super Mario Wiki: Difference between revisions
SeanWheeler (talk | contribs) |
Chickasaurus (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:No answer? Hello? I'm still waiting for a response. [[User:SeanWheeler|SeanWheeler]] ([[User talk:SeanWheeler|talk]]) 00:00, 3 February 2014 (UTC) | :No answer? Hello? I'm still waiting for a response. [[User:SeanWheeler|SeanWheeler]] ([[User talk:SeanWheeler|talk]]) 00:00, 3 February 2014 (UTC) | ||
::I agree that they aren't really relevant, and I personally think that the individual articles should redirect to the [[Nintendo Independent Wiki Alliance]] article. Histories and other information regarding NIWA wikis are already covered on NintendoWiki, though regarding this article about Super Mario Wiki, there is some information that could be moved on to NintendoWiki, provided that the authors are attributed. I feel that the NIWA article itself should stay, due to Bulbapedia being part of the network and Archaic's involvement in it. --[[User:Chickasaurus|Chickasaurus]] ([[User talk:Chickasaurus|talk]]) 17:50, 3 February 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:50, 3 February 2014
Why would a Mario based subject like Super Mario Wiki have a page in a Pokémon Wiki like Bulbapedia? --SeanWheeler 15:52, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
- Your answer: Nintendo Independent Wiki Alliance It's a part of NIWA. Luna Tiger * the Arc Toraph 16:00, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
Logo
Super Mario Wiki's Logo is different now. It is sort of like a pic of mario with the words super mario wiki on it and the background it sort of like blurry but looks like the mushroom kingdom. you should go see for yourself in this link-[1]--LilKayKayGal
Do we need NIWA articles?
While I know we are part of the Nintendo Independant Wiki Alliance, but how do our affiliates affect the Pokémon fanbase? The only Pokémon related info on Super Mario Wiki is Super Smash Bros. content. Same goes for Smash Wiki. The other wikis, not so much Pokémon info. These are wikis about other Nintendo franchises. And would a Pokémon fan spend a lot of time on a Zelda Wiki? And these articles don't even talk about Pokémon. So how are they notable? SeanWheeler (talk) 04:25, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
- No answer? Hello? I'm still waiting for a response. SeanWheeler (talk) 00:00, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
- I agree that they aren't really relevant, and I personally think that the individual articles should redirect to the Nintendo Independent Wiki Alliance article. Histories and other information regarding NIWA wikis are already covered on NintendoWiki, though regarding this article about Super Mario Wiki, there is some information that could be moved on to NintendoWiki, provided that the authors are attributed. I feel that the NIWA article itself should stay, due to Bulbapedia being part of the network and Archaic's involvement in it. --Chickasaurus (talk) 17:50, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
