Talk:Sky Attack (move): Difference between revisions
Iam.soviet19 (talk | contribs) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
[[User:Truthseeker4449|Truthseeker4449]] 20:08, 19 June 2011 (UTC) | [[User:Truthseeker4449|Truthseeker4449]] 20:08, 19 June 2011 (UTC) | ||
:Fixed. Looks like it was accidentally removed during the (ongoing) template upgrade. <span class="sc">[[User:Werdnae|<span style="color:#2D4B98;">Werdnae</span>]]</span> <small>[[User talk:Werdnae|<span style="color:#009000;">(talk)</span>]]</small> 22:08, 19 June 2011 (UTC) | :Fixed. Looks like it was accidentally removed during the (ongoing) template upgrade. <span class="sc">[[User:Werdnae|<span style="color:#2D4B98;">Werdnae</span>]]</span> <small>[[User talk:Werdnae|<span style="color:#009000;">(talk)</span>]]</small> 22:08, 19 June 2011 (UTC) | ||
== High Critical-hit ratio == | |||
Can anyone confirm that Sky Attack still lacks a high critical-hit chance? I'm pretty sure I've seen it get ''WAY'' too many crits for a 'normal' move...that just may be me being unlucky, but the 'information' is still pretty old. | |||
So in general, I'd like that Trivia statement checked for two reasons: | |||
1. It's old information (I swear it's been unchanged for ''years'') | |||
2. Personal experience of it getting more crits than normal. | |||
[[User:PokeMaster99999|PokeMaster99999]] ([[User talk:PokeMaster99999|talk]]) 18:06, 12 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
: Okay, so it looks like the article is now '''divided''' on whether the move has a HCHR (it's even placed into the category). The gen III effect has added it into the article, yet the trivia has remained the same. How are we going to deal with this and what needs to change? '''[[User:iam.soviet19|<sub style="color:#00CC00">I AM</sub>]] [[User talk:iam.soviet19|<span style="color:#CC0000"><sc>so ''Viet''</sc></span>]] [[Special:Contributions/iam.soviet19|<sup style="color:#6600FF">19</sup>]]''' 03:48, 23 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 03:48, 23 July 2014
Signature move
As far as i could tell from the signature moves page, it counted all methods of learning the move. So since sky attack was a TM in gen 1 i dont think it was moltres signature move, since 8+ other pokemon could learn it. That also makes it not work for gen 2 because of the ability to move pokemon over. - unsigned comment from Gardeford (talk • contribs)
- It was a signature move only in Generation II. Connecting to a previous Generation isn't considered for signature moves. Glik (talk) 18:17, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Farfetch'd
The Farfetch'd page says he learns the move as well via TM... Can anyone add that information, or confirm it at the very least? Redstar 08:53, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
- Um... no it doesn't. —darklordtrom 09:03, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
- Fourteenth row down: http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/Farfetch%27d_(Pok%C3%A9mon)/Generation_I_learnset#By_TM.2FHM Redstar 09:06, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
- Three other sites say no. It's been removed. —darklordtrom 09:23, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
- Fourteenth row down: http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/Farfetch%27d_(Pok%C3%A9mon)/Generation_I_learnset#By_TM.2FHM Redstar 09:06, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
Lugia
Lugia can learn Sky Attack at Lv. 99, yet I don't see Lugia on the Page under "By level up" Truthseeker4449 20:08, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
- Fixed. Looks like it was accidentally removed during the (ongoing) template upgrade. Werdnae (talk) 22:08, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
High Critical-hit ratio
Can anyone confirm that Sky Attack still lacks a high critical-hit chance? I'm pretty sure I've seen it get WAY too many crits for a 'normal' move...that just may be me being unlucky, but the 'information' is still pretty old. So in general, I'd like that Trivia statement checked for two reasons: 1. It's old information (I swear it's been unchanged for years) 2. Personal experience of it getting more crits than normal. PokeMaster99999 (talk) 18:06, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
- Okay, so it looks like the article is now divided on whether the move has a HCHR (it's even placed into the category). The gen III effect has added it into the article, yet the trivia has remained the same. How are we going to deal with this and what needs to change? I AM so Viet 19 03:48, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
