Talk:Pyroar (Pokémon): Difference between revisions
CoolDudeAl (talk | contribs) (→Mane) |
PortalDark (talk | contribs) (→Mane) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
I also agree that it has the kanji for fire in it's mane. I'm not sure if seeing other angles will make it anymore obvious though, as it is only visible when seen head on, and is probably the reason the artwork's head is drawn head on. [[User:CoolDudeAl|CoolDudeAl]] ([[User talk:CoolDudeAl|talk]]) 01:29, 13 September 2013 (UTC) | I also agree that it has the kanji for fire in it's mane. I'm not sure if seeing other angles will make it anymore obvious though, as it is only visible when seen head on, and is probably the reason the artwork's head is drawn head on. [[User:CoolDudeAl|CoolDudeAl]] ([[User talk:CoolDudeAl|talk]]) 01:29, 13 September 2013 (UTC) | ||
It sure does have a kanji for "fire" on his mane, it is definetly worth nothing that on "Physical Appearance" 11:07, 13 September 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 11:07, 13 September 2013
Evolution
I'm not saying it has been confirmed, but who here thinks it is NOT related to Litleo? It either evolves directly from it or evolves from another fiery lion that Litleo evolves into similar to Luxray's relation to Shinx. If the origin of its name has been acknowledged as "pyro" and "roar" I feel this should as well. Nintendo101 (talk) 10:46, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
- It's obviously part of the Litleo line. Either way, until it's confirmed, there's nothing to do but wait. Ataro (talk) 11:03, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
Litleo
Please add it to the PrevNext template. オリジナル TheOriginalOne 17:25, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
- It shouldn't be, because we don't know whether the line will go Litleo -> Pyroar or Litleo -> something else -> Pyroar. All the Bulbanews article (which I'm assuming is correct) says is that it's "an" evolution of Litleo. Pumpkinking0192 (talk) 18:14, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
Mane
Can we admit the possibility of it being based on the kanji 火 fire? Or is it just too unlikely to be included? オリジナル TheOriginalOne 18:33, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
- It's possible, and I definitely see it, but I kind of want to learn more about it and see it from different angles before adding that, if that makes sense? Just to be safe. ★Jo the Marten★ ಠ_ಠ♥ 18:46, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
I also agree that it has the kanji for fire in it's mane. I'm not sure if seeing other angles will make it anymore obvious though, as it is only visible when seen head on, and is probably the reason the artwork's head is drawn head on. CoolDudeAl (talk) 01:29, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
It sure does have a kanji for "fire" on his mane, it is definetly worth nothing that on "Physical Appearance" 11:07, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
