Please remember to follow the manual of style and code of conduct at all times.
Check BNN and Bulbanews for up-to-date Pokémon news and discuss it on the forums or in our IRC channel #bulbagarden on irc.systemnet.info.

Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pokémon Gold and Silver beta/Featured article candidate/Nomination 1"

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search
(Object (2))
Line 11: Line 11:
 
*I dont think an article about someting that might not even happen should be a featured article--'''[[User:Mooites|Mooites]]''' <sup>[[User talk:Mooites|Talk to me, baby!]]</sup> 16:19, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
 
*I dont think an article about someting that might not even happen should be a featured article--'''[[User:Mooites|Mooites]]''' <sup>[[User talk:Mooites|Talk to me, baby!]]</sup> 16:19, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
 
::What do you mean? Have you even visited it? This is the article talking about the beta, not a possible remake. --[[User:RexRacer|'''<font color="#E7CE6B">Rex</font><font color="#42528C">Racer</font>''']] [[User talk:RexRacer|'''<font color="#FF5A00"><small>''-talk''</small></font>''']] 16:57, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
 
::What do you mean? Have you even visited it? This is the article talking about the beta, not a possible remake. --[[User:RexRacer|'''<font color="#E7CE6B">Rex</font><font color="#42528C">Racer</font>''']] [[User talk:RexRacer|'''<font color="#FF5A00"><small>''-talk''</small></font>''']] 16:57, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
  +
*It's detailed and informative, but personally, I think someone might have overdid the pictures. If you could clean it up a bit more, I'll agree. [[User:JirachiWishmaker0802|JirachiWishmaker0802]] 00:55, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
   
 
===Other comments===
 
===Other comments===

Revision as of 00:55, 15 October 2008

Support (6)

  • I liked this article. It was colorful and contained a lot of information. --Clarky 10:06, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
  • I agree. It's a very good article.--RexRacer -talk 15:48, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
  • I like it. A nice historical look at the development and release of GS. At the time, of course, this was all new and novel, so there's a good reason to document it thoroughly. --((Marton imos)) 00:18, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Spr 4d 132.png Aura-Knight 01:24, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Its Totally Awesome.--David Aipom (Talk to me) 15:21, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
  • I liked it, it showed what might've happened in GS and had a lot of informational pictures.--Hey1031 15:57, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Object (2)

  • Meh. Seems kind of empty and not detailed to me. Maybe a bit more organization of pics, and I might choose it. ht14 12:40, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
  • I dont think an article about someting that might not even happen should be a featured article--Mooites Talk to me, baby! 16:19, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
What do you mean? Have you even visited it? This is the article talking about the beta, not a possible remake. --RexRacer -talk 16:57, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
  • It's detailed and informative, but personally, I think someone might have overdid the pictures. If you could clean it up a bit more, I'll agree. JirachiWishmaker0802 00:55, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Other comments