Please remember to follow the manual of style and code of conduct at all times.
Check BNN and Bulbanews for up-to-date Pokémon news and discuss it on the forums or in our IRC channel #bulbagarden on

Difference between revisions of "Talk:Poké Ball/Featured article candidate"

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Support (6))
m (Object (0): Oppose)
Line 14: Line 14:
*Ditto. Nothing really left for me to say. [[User:Surskitty|surskitty]] 22:01, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
*Ditto. Nothing really left for me to say. [[User:Surskitty|surskitty]] 22:01, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
===Object (0)===
===Object (1)===
*'''Oppose.''' Too short, strange layout. {{User:Jellochuu/s}} 23:43, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
===Other comments===
===Other comments===

Revision as of 23:43, 18 April 2005

Support (7)

  • A very informative game related article in my opinion, well illustrated and well documented. - Arty2 09:46, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • I concur with Arty. It's a very well-written, informative article that probably should be among the top. However, I think the layout may need a little bit of fixing before we present it as a FA. evkl 10:27, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • I concur as well. An article that has a direct relation to Pokémon would seem to be the better choice for the first feature. - Archaic 23:53, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Agree with evkl. - Jshadias 05:37, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • With a bit of a layout cleanup and a small bit of information on the mechanics of Poké Balls (or from what you can piece together) I think it would be a perfect candidate. - Ferret
  • I agree. The only thing that annoys me is that we're lacking individual illustrations for all the Balls, but aside from that - it's a good choice. - Zeta
  • Ditto. Nothing really left for me to say. surskitty 22:01, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Object (1)

Other comments