Talk:Poké Ball/Featured article candidate: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (→Support (3)) |
Fabu-Vinny (talk | contribs) m (Protected "Talk:Poké Ball/Featured article candidate": closed discussion [edit=sysop:move=sysop]) |
||
| (11 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===Support ( | ====Support (9)==== | ||
* A very informative game related article in my opinion, well illustrated and well documented. - [[User talk:Arty2|Arty2]] 09:46, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC) | * A very informative game related article in my opinion, well illustrated and well documented. - [[User talk:Arty2|Arty2]] 09:46, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC) | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
*Agree with evkl. - [[User:Jshadias|Jshadias]] 05:37, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC) | *Agree with evkl. - [[User:Jshadias|Jshadias]] 05:37, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC) | ||
===Object ( | *With a bit of a layout cleanup and a small bit of information on the mechanics of Poké Balls (or from what you can piece together) I think it would be a perfect candidate. - [[User:Ferret|Ferret]] | ||
* | |||
===Other comments=== | *I agree. The only thing that annoys me is that we're lacking individual illustrations for all the Balls, but aside from that - it's a good choice. - Zeta | ||
*Ditto. Nothing really left for me to say. [[User:Surskitty|surskitty]] 22:01, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC) | |||
*Probably the best article on the site [[User:Coppro|Coppro]] 01:25, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC) | |||
*Beyond a doubt one of the best articles now, even better than it was when it was first nominated as a FAC. There has been some discussion of breaking it down into individual ball articles, the thought of which makes me sad - it's a beautiful article, and if we do move to individual ball articles, I think this one should be moved to "Ball" and, besides links to the individual articles, remain untouched. --[[User:Pie|Pie]] <sup>~[[User talk:Pie|♪]][[Special:Contributions/Pie|♫]]</sup> 18:28, 8 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
*Its all right! --[[User:Kuki|Kuki]] 23:01, 3 April 2008 (UTC)Kuki | |||
====Object (1)==== | |||
*'''Oppose.''' Too short, strange layout. <span style="color:#3e7614;">—</span> [[User:Jellochuu|<span style="color:#a1cf31;">Jellochuu</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Jellochuu|<span style="color:#3e7614;font-size:160%;">¾]]</span></sup> 23:43, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC) | |||
====Other comments==== | |||
Latest revision as of 20:03, 29 October 2008
Support (9)
- A very informative game related article in my opinion, well illustrated and well documented. - Arty2 09:46, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- I concur with Arty. It's a very well-written, informative article that probably should be among the top. However, I think the layout may need a little bit of fixing before we present it as a FA. evkl 10:27, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- I concur as well. An article that has a direct relation to Pokémon would seem to be the better choice for the first feature. - Archaic 23:53, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Agree with evkl. - Jshadias 05:37, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- With a bit of a layout cleanup and a small bit of information on the mechanics of Poké Balls (or from what you can piece together) I think it would be a perfect candidate. - Ferret
- I agree. The only thing that annoys me is that we're lacking individual illustrations for all the Balls, but aside from that - it's a good choice. - Zeta
- Ditto. Nothing really left for me to say. surskitty 22:01, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Probably the best article on the site Coppro 01:25, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Beyond a doubt one of the best articles now, even better than it was when it was first nominated as a FAC. There has been some discussion of breaking it down into individual ball articles, the thought of which makes me sad - it's a beautiful article, and if we do move to individual ball articles, I think this one should be moved to "Ball" and, besides links to the individual articles, remain untouched. --Pie ~♪♫ 18:28, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Its all right! --Kuki 23:01, 3 April 2008 (UTC)Kuki
