Talk:Parental Bond (Ability)
--Darkmaster (talk) 04:39, 1 November 2013 (UTC)How would this ability affect a move like, say, Giga Impact? Would it attack once, then rest, making it a one turn move? Would it attack twice and rest for 2 turns? Or would it be attack twice, then rest one turn? I am just curious.
- Just tested. They both hit on the same round, and then recharge on the next turn, and are able to act again on the turn after. So, it works exactly like it would with any other Pokemon. When using an attack with Parental Bond, it will say "Hit 2 times!" as if it were a move like Double Hit. PowerPlantRaichu (talk) 18:42, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Power-Up Punch
Power up Punch and similar moves give their bonuses twice when used with Parental Bond. PowerPlantRaichu (talk) 19:24, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
Damage Reduction
Does anyone know the exact damage reduction for the second hit. I have read 50% on Smogon but I'm not sure how reliable that number is. Ctom42 (talk) 15:18, 4 November 2013 (UTC) It is 50%. But not the damage is reduced, but the power of the move is halved. It still can do an own critical hit and fixed damage is not affected. I guess it also has its own random factor in the damage calculation. - Pokémon Questions? -- 03:34, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
Earthquake
The article currently mentions earthquake only hitting once in horde and triple battles. What about double battles? And is it just earthquake or is it all moves which hit multiple opponents? Or is it all moves which hit both opponents and allies? Also do those type of moves have a specific name I can tag them as, similar to how multi-hit moves are tagged right now? Ctom42 (talk) 15:20, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
Status Moves
Are Status moves also performed twice? Recover, Sword Dance, even Protect...? - Pokémon Questions? -- 03:30, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- Only moves that do damage are affected. Glik (talk) 03:40, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you. But the sentence "This only affects moves that do damage." is confusing. What does it mean then? If is meant, that it must not miss, that is explained in the last paragraph. - Pokémon Questions? -- 03:56, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- What about it is confusing? It can't be any more straightforward; moves that deal damage are affected, moves that don't, aren't. Glik (talk) 04:05, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- The context is confusing: "with the second attack being half as strong as the first. This only affects moves that do damage." Of course damage (actually it is the power and not the damage) can only be halved by offensive moves. But it does not sound unambiguous. Nowhere in the description cleary stands that Status Moves are excluded. Perpaps it would be good to write "This ablility only affects moves that do damage." instead. - Pokémon Questions? -- 15:11, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- How is it not clear that status moves aren't affected? You just said that it's obvious only damage can be halved. The first sentence makes it apparent that it only affects damaging moves, the second sentence clarifies it. It doesn't matter if "This" is referring to the Ability or its effect, there's no difference between them. If the Ability had a second affect, further clarification would be needed but it doesn't. The Ability only affects damaging moves, so it's effects must only apply to damaging moves and vice versa. Glik (talk) 16:04, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- The context is confusing: "with the second attack being half as strong as the first. This only affects moves that do damage." Of course damage (actually it is the power and not the damage) can only be halved by offensive moves. But it does not sound unambiguous. Nowhere in the description cleary stands that Status Moves are excluded. Perpaps it would be good to write "This ablility only affects moves that do damage." instead. - Pokémon Questions? -- 15:11, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- What about it is confusing? It can't be any more straightforward; moves that deal damage are affected, moves that don't, aren't. Glik (talk) 04:05, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you. But the sentence "This only affects moves that do damage." is confusing. What does it mean then? If is meant, that it must not miss, that is explained in the last paragraph. - Pokémon Questions? -- 03:56, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
Moves mentioned that can't even be legitimately learned
Why are so many moved mentioned, moves that aren't even possible for Kangaskhan to learn?
Dragon Tail, U-turn and Volt Switch Bug Bite and Pluck Smelling Salts, Wake-Up Slap and Knock Off all to name a few.
Why are these moves even mentioned? Yamitora1 (talk) 08:25, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
