Talk:List of type combinations by abundance

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search

Can the type combination table be sorttable? ht14 14:31, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

The second one already is; I don't know why the sort arrows don't show up (maybe because of the text/background color? maybe because the cells are too small to accomodate them?). The whole point of the first one is that it's ranked, so I don't think making that one also sortable would make much sense. Pumpkinking0192 (talk) 17:42, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Yeah, that's true. I didn't realize that by just pressing the "Generation" title, there would be something sorted. Thanks~ ht14 02:56, 2 August 2013 (UTC)


Two things

  • Mega evolution should be included. I think so, as alternate forms are included.
  • Should this appear in the Lists of Pokémon template?

--Nico649 (talk) 00:26, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Another two Things

  1. 171 Type Combinations possible and 324 different combinations based on the order in which the types come.
  2. What is meant by the Incomplete Message, it doesn't make much sense.

--Ditto51/Tom (My Talk Page) 23:02, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Because, it's not the type order, people better fix it for the type order in Normal, Fighting, Flying, Poison, Ground, Rock, Bug, Ghost, Steel, Fire, Water, Grass, Electric, Psychic, Ice, Dragon, Dark and Fairy. Cinday123 (talk) 23:11, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Diancie

Since it was revealed, is it ready to be added or not yet due to the lack of its menu sprite? --Cinday123 (Talk) 10:29, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

I support the idea of adding it in; its types have been confirmed in official sources, including Pokémon.com (This link goes to the Pokémon X and Pokémon Y homepage, where the news article for Diancie is displayed). Superbreeder 03:40, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
It was already added on Feb. 13, almost a month ago. Look before you post. Pumpkinking0192 (talk) 04:09, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Mega Evolutions

Shouldn't the other Mega Evolutions be added? TheSilentHero (talk) 17:33, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Unused Type Combinations

Should a section of unused type combinations be added?

While the second table does show the unused type combination by showing a total of 0 Pokemon for that type combination, should it have its own section?

While not useful in any way, it is interesting. - unsigned comment from Disgraced (talkcontribs)

As you pointed out, the second table show the unused combinations, and you can easily check what's unused, since you can sort the table. I don't see the point in having that section if you can already easily check the thing. Eridanus (talk) 07:05, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Volcanion

I think the number of used type combinations should be updated to 132 as Volcanion is a Fire/Water type Pokemon and the only one at that.- unsigned comment from Disgraced (talkcontribs)

Volcanion hasn't been officially revealed. This is also why Hoopa isn't in the article as well.--ForceFire 04:16, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

How come Mega-Audino and Mega-Slowbro are considered official when the only source is a leak and not an official announcement? --Disgraced (talk) 04:23, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

Pokemon.com is official.--ForceFire 04:25, 16 August 2014 (UTC)