Please remember to follow the manual of style and code of conduct at all times.
Check BNN and Bulbanews for up-to-date Pokémon news and discuss it on the forums or in our IRC channel #bulbagarden on irc.systemnet.info.

Difference between revisions of "Talk:List of items by type"

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search
m
Line 12: Line 12:
   
 
Yes, you can see what it looks like in Fr/Lg (and probably emerald too). Also, is it ok to add items one by one, or should they be added section by section?
 
Yes, you can see what it looks like in Fr/Lg (and probably emerald too). Also, is it ok to add items one by one, or should they be added section by section?
  +
  +
----
  +
  +
In what games is Lemonade avaliable in? {{User:Jellochuu/s}} 22:34, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:34, 20 March 2005

I believe some/all items should have individual pages, as well as this easy-view page. There's a hell of a lot you can say for one item. - Ferret 00:48, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Define items that would warrant more than a paragraph. Evkl 01:02, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)

I believe a lot can be said of Rare Candy, for one. Definitive places to get particular items too would be especially useful. - Ferret

That's actually not a bad idea. A summary of what they do, where you can get it, what it looks like, there's a lot you can say about any particular item. surskitty

Does anyone really care what the items look like? Can't someone figure out what an Escape Rope looks like, and such? I agree that maybe some of the more important items should have their own pages, but a lot don't need it. Evkl 05:33, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Maybe there should be an extra level of sorting in the Item List: by Bag placement. There could be a separate section for Hold Items, Key Items, and Regular Items. Just a suggestion.CastformRED

Yes, you can see what it looks like in Fr/Lg (and probably emerald too). Also, is it ok to add items one by one, or should they be added section by section?


In what games is Lemonade avaliable in? User:Jellochuu/s 22:34, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)