Talk:Generation VII: Difference between revisions

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 22: Line 22:
:::::::::::* http://pokemon.gamespress.com/release.asp?i=1942&lang=en&region=United+Kingdom
:::::::::::* http://pokemon.gamespress.com/release.asp?i=1942&lang=en&region=United+Kingdom
:::::::::::[[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 17:14, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
:::::::::::[[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 17:14, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
{{indent}}It has been used officially in the past for the first games of a generation:
*''"Welcome to the '''next generation''' of Pokémon!"'' (back of the box for Diamond and Pearl)
*''"Pokémon Diamond and Pokémon Pearl, exclusively on Nintendo DS, prove that the '''next generation''' of Pokémon games is taking the hugely popular franchise to amazing new levels."'' ([http://www.nintendo.com/games/detail/Sw8fLPiPMydfaiwZREgJ2N6Q-wwFePWC Nintendo.com])
*''"Pokémon Black Version and Pokémon White Version features a '''new generation''' of amazing Pokémon."'' ([http://www.pokemon.com/us/pokemon-video-games/pokemon-black-version-and-pokemon-white-version/ Pokemon.com])
*''"Pokémon Black Version and Pokémon White Version will feature a '''new generation''' of amazing Pokémon."'' ([http://www.nintendo.com/games/detail/KYV94iTvLxiUlOoM08N1simS8TaWvduX Nintendo.com])
*''"An all-new 3D Pokémon adventure packed with never-before-seen Pokémon has launched! Pokémon X and Pokémon Y presents a '''new generation''' of Pokémon and introduces players to an exciting new adventure in a breathtaking 3D world."'' ([http://www.pokemon.com/us/pokemon-video-games/pokemon-x-and-pokemon-y/ Pokemon.com])
--[[User:Abcboy|Abcboy]] ([[User talk:Abcboy|talk]]) 17:20, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:20, 3 April 2016

BulbaBot.png This talkpage is only for discussion of the article itself!

As not yet all information is known about the subject of the article, please do not ask here if the editors of Bulbapedia know any information about related subjects. As new information is revealed, if the article is protected, put this information in a new section of this talkpage, and it will be added to the article as soon as possible. If the article is not protected, add the information while adhering strictly to Bulbapedia's manual of style.

Please take any other discussion or questions regarding the subject of the article to the Bulbagarden Forums, where you can discuss it freely with other members of the Bulbagarden community.

And remember, BulbaBot is watching you.


Magearna

I suppose there's not enough evidence to call Magearna new to Gen VII even though it would make her the Zoroark/Lucario/Mega Mewtwo-esque "preview Pokemon"? Nutter Butter (talk) 16:43, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

I guess we just have to wait and see what her PokéDex number is. --Raltseye 16:48, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Gen VII?

What evidence is there that these are intended to be Gen VII and not part of Gen VI? Drake Clawfang (talk) 17:23, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

http://pokemon.gamespress.com/release.asp?i=1942&lang=en&region=United+Kingdom Undeniable proof. Torpoleon (talk) 17:48, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
The best evidence at the moment is probably that you apparently can't trade directly between XY/ORAS and SM. I say "apparently" because they don't explicitly say you can't trade with them (only that you can use Bank to bring XY/ORAS Pokemon into SM), but if you could, then you'd be able to move VC RBY Pokemon to XY/ORAS, but that doesn't seem likely when that same page explicitly says you can't Bank VC RBY Pokemon to XY/ORAS... Tiddlywinks (talk) 17:54, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Yeah I don't see anything there that can be considered proof. Flain (talk) 19:07, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
"Newest Generation of Pokémon Core Series Games coming to Nintendo 3DS Late 2016" isn't proof? Nutter Butter (talk) 19:21, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
That doesn't necessarily mean Generation 7. It is possible they mean something else by it.Flain (talk) 03:54, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
What else could it mean? 6.5 isn't really a new generation as it's still within Generation VI. It literally say "Newest Generation", that's as clear as clear can get.--ForceFire 03:59, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Look I just don't think it should be called Generation VII until we actually know more about the games because there's no way to know what could happen at this point since we know next to nothing. That's just how I see it.Flain (talk) 04:20, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
I know Bulbapedia has pretty ridiculous concepts of what is "confirmed", but saying "there's a 1% chance they could mean something besides what they said" is just overkill. Nutter Butter (talk) 19:26, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Isn't "generation" a fan term? Has it ever been used officially? N. Harmonik (talk) 02:30, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Nintendo nor Game Freak have never used the term. This could mean anything given it's just a marketing headline. Rebmcr (talk) 17:05, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
It was in the official press releases...
Tiddlywinks (talk) 17:14, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

(resetting indent)It has been used officially in the past for the first games of a generation:

  • "Welcome to the next generation of Pokémon!" (back of the box for Diamond and Pearl)
  • "Pokémon Diamond and Pokémon Pearl, exclusively on Nintendo DS, prove that the next generation of Pokémon games is taking the hugely popular franchise to amazing new levels." (Nintendo.com)
  • "Pokémon Black Version and Pokémon White Version features a new generation of amazing Pokémon." (Pokemon.com)
  • "Pokémon Black Version and Pokémon White Version will feature a new generation of amazing Pokémon." (Nintendo.com)
  • "An all-new 3D Pokémon adventure packed with never-before-seen Pokémon has launched! Pokémon X and Pokémon Y presents a new generation of Pokémon and introduces players to an exciting new adventure in a breathtaking 3D world." (Pokemon.com)

--Abcboy (talk) 17:20, 3 April 2016 (UTC)