Please remember to follow the manual of style and code of conduct at all times.
Check BNN and Bulbanews for up-to-date Pokémon news and discuss it on the forums or in our IRC channel #bulbagarden on irc.systemnet.info.

Difference between revisions of "Talk:Eeveelution"

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search
(Request: Minor edit to trivia: new section)
Line 82: Line 82:
 
:::Oh, I didn't notice the word "all" when I read and removed it. Regardless, it's not notable in my opinion. The same piece of trivia can apply to fully evolved starters, Dragon-type legendaries, Nidos, elemental monkeys, Rotom's forms and so on.--'''[[User:Dennou Zenshi|<font color="#AB0909">電</font><font color="#063A73">禅</font>]]<small>[[User talk:Dennou Zenshi|<font color="#fff" face="Tahoma"><span style="text-shadow:#000 0.2em 0.1em 0.1em; class=texhtml">Den Zen</span></font>]]</small>''' 21:45, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
 
:::Oh, I didn't notice the word "all" when I read and removed it. Regardless, it's not notable in my opinion. The same piece of trivia can apply to fully evolved starters, Dragon-type legendaries, Nidos, elemental monkeys, Rotom's forms and so on.--'''[[User:Dennou Zenshi|<font color="#AB0909">電</font><font color="#063A73">禅</font>]]<small>[[User talk:Dennou Zenshi|<font color="#fff" face="Tahoma"><span style="text-shadow:#000 0.2em 0.1em 0.1em; class=texhtml">Den Zen</span></font>]]</small>''' 21:45, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
 
::::There are a few different combinations as you said, but rarely any of them are grouped like the Eeveelutions, elemental monkeys, etc here on Bulbapedia. THat would make it more notable to me. Notability is really in the eye of the beholder on this one. --[[User:HoennMaster|<font color="blue">Hoenn</font>]][[User talk:HoennMaster|<font color="green">Master</font>]] 02:45, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
 
::::There are a few different combinations as you said, but rarely any of them are grouped like the Eeveelutions, elemental monkeys, etc here on Bulbapedia. THat would make it more notable to me. Notability is really in the eye of the beholder on this one. --[[User:HoennMaster|<font color="blue">Hoenn</font>]][[User talk:HoennMaster|<font color="green">Master</font>]] 02:45, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
  +
  +
== Request: Minor edit to trivia ==
  +
  +
There's a minor typo needs fixing on the last bullet point in the trivia seaction: "unless it it traded to Black and White," should say "unless it '''is''' traded". I'd have done it myself, but the page is currently locked due to Sylveon's announcement. [[User:Digifiend|Digifiend]] ([[User talk:Digifiend|talk]]) 14:51, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:51, 14 February 2013

Who coined the term? Pokéball 23:59, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

It is a fanon term but we use it because it was a name of a TCG deck. Pokemaniac102

Hey I made a new Eeveelutions page. I think you'll find it to be very informative! click here. TheEspeonMaster. 07:33, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Shouldn't someone mention that Leafeon and Glaceon have appeared in the anime, just not in person and that Glaceon will appear in DP076?Pkmnluvr25 03:49, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Is it fanon?

Im sure the term eeveelution isnt fanon because i just seen the new Majestic Dawn advert. Its the UK one with a 3d eevee stood in the middle of some ruins looking at cards of all of it's evolutions. The advert said "Collect a new Eeveelution! It's not fanon, its official. Should I change it?Davidaipom 15:18, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

It was originally a fanon term, and hence still is, but Wizards chose to use the term for their Eeveelution theme deck, and a World Champion also named his deck the Eeveelutions theme deck. That's also the reason it's used in the Majestic Dawn advert, yes. Cipher 16:22, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
Maybe the term "Eeveelutions" has grown in popularity to the point that it might as well be an official name. Diachronos 18:20, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
Point made. ht14 05:18, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
I think we should probably consider the term a Pokémon equivalent of what Generation 1 is to the Transformers franchise. A term started in fanon that eventually fell into official usage. --Shiningpikablu252 05:22, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Shot in Movie 11

Anyone know were one of those might be found? Serebii has one but its not especially good quality. The scene would fit with the article. Aura-Knight 23:20, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Thank you. Aura-Knight 03:21, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

May I add this?

i was reading the Nintendo Power Stadium 2 Guild and in the back it said Eeveelution. --Pokéboy93 05:19, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Gen IV Envolutions

Though unlike their evolutionary cousins, they were not available early on in Pokémon Diamond and Pearl, they are in fact available early on in Pokémon Platinum, even before the player has gotten the third badge.

That's halfway correct. You can get Leafeon before the third badge, but not Glaceon. Should it be changed, or left the way it is?--Gou 20:10, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Would

this make a good FAC? CuboneKing 03:16, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

If you think so, nominate it. Turtwig A (talk | contribs) 03:17, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
It is the best fandom article, but I don't want to make myself look like an idiot. CuboneKing 03:18, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
I'd support it. It has great comparison boxes and fandom info.--♫Green♫ギャラドス♫Talk♫ 03:20, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

I have a question.

Considering that there are now seasons (as of Generation V), does that mean that we can expect to be able to get the eeveelutions in Black and White? --Pokemon26 20:02, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Are you serious??? All new Pokémon were released a month ago.--でんのう Zえんし 20:07, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
Sorry, misread your message. You can get evosotnes, day/night/happiness exists and there are ice and moss rock.--でんのう Zえんし 20:12, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for apologizing,Dennou Zenshi. I was just asking about the eeveelutions just because I wanted to know if that was possible. I knew that all the Pokemon for Generation 5 were released a month ago.--Pokemon26 00:44, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

DRAGON ESPEON!!??

I've just changed Espeon from dragon type to phycic type (probably vandels) no need to thank me :D --Matty19892009 18:33, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

eevee moveset?

anyone consider adding eevee's moveset to the template? why is it missing anyway other than the fact that it stop learning new moves at level 57? -Pokeant 05:53, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

The first sentence: "An Eeveelution is a popular term among fans used for the current group of seven Pokémon that evolve from Eevee." It does not describe Eevee. ht14 18:00, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
Then why is eevee listed with the gen 1 eeveelutions? -Pokeant 14:01, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
Also, I would have liked to see Eevee's moveset in there not because it isn't or is technically an Eeveelution, but so that I can decide when a good time to evolve it would be in a convenient template. ~ Ribose · talk · cntr · 04:59, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
I agree with Ribose. The article becomes much more practical/useful if Eevee's moveset is added since, of course each eeveelution can know the moves learnt by Eevee, and for timing the evolution optimally (above). If the movelist shouldn't be added, then the paragraph and side-template for Eevee should probably be removed for consistency (as per Pokeant). Nytik 18:47, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Stab

It has BITE as a stab move for eevee. Grass is the best (talk) 01:59, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

It's in bold italics which means that it will get STAB when it evolves (in this case, Umbreon).--ForceFire 02:02, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
Sorry I didn't notice the italics. Grass is the best (talk) 23:57, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Stat Chart

While having each one's individual chart is nice, what about a collective chart comparing them like the legendary trio pages have? Drake Clawfang (talk) 03:57, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

I like the idea. We have a moveset comparison, so why not a stat one? --SnorlaxMonster 04:35, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
So, looking at the legendary pages it looks like they use templates designed specifically for trios. So it seems the even Eeveelutions would need a new template for themselves. Drake Clawfang (talk) 23:51, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Ninfia

We can add a Generation VI subsection and state that Ninfia will be available in it. Also, for the anime section we can add a bit about how all of them will be featured in the upcoming short before the next movie. And the number of Eeveelutions at the top of the page needs to be changed from seven to eight. --CoolDudeAl (talk) 23:43, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Done. Jo the Marten ಠ_ಠ 00:20, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Trivia

  • During Generations II and III it was possible to have an in-game party of six consisting solely of Eevee and all its evolutions.

No, this is not possible ever since GS. In-game party is only six. In those generation you could use Eevee in one slot and all five of its then evolutions in the remaining five slots. Not possible post-Generation III because Eevee has more than 5 evolutions. --HoennMaster 19:05, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Hence why it says only in Generations II and III. I don't get what you're trying to say? ----samm :) (talk) 20:29, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
Yes, because that is how I worded it, and now it has been removed because the person who removed it say "isn't that possible in every game since GS?". But it has not. Those two Generations were the only ones this was possible in. Sorry to sound confusing but it's kind of hard to explain. --HoennMaster 21:01, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
Oh, I didn't notice the word "all" when I read and removed it. Regardless, it's not notable in my opinion. The same piece of trivia can apply to fully evolved starters, Dragon-type legendaries, Nidos, elemental monkeys, Rotom's forms and so on.--Den Zen 21:45, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
There are a few different combinations as you said, but rarely any of them are grouped like the Eeveelutions, elemental monkeys, etc here on Bulbapedia. THat would make it more notable to me. Notability is really in the eye of the beholder on this one. --HoennMaster 02:45, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Request: Minor edit to trivia

There's a minor typo needs fixing on the last bullet point in the trivia seaction: "unless it it traded to Black and White," should say "unless it is traded". I'd have done it myself, but the page is currently locked due to Sylveon's announcement. Digifiend (talk) 14:51, 14 February 2013 (UTC)