Please remember to follow the manual of style and code of conduct at all times.
Check BNN and Bulbanews for up-to-date Pokémon news and discuss it on the forums or in our IRC channel #bulbagarden on irc.systemnet.info.

Difference between revisions of "Talk:Charizard (Base Set 4)/Featured article candidate/Nomination 1"

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search
(Other comments)
(Other comments)
Line 9: Line 9:
 
* It's good for a card article, but aren't featured articles supposed to have more... content? I'm not saying it should be improved, I mean, if we really start featuring monthly and there's nothing better, this could work - but compared to other FA, it's... lacking content. --[[User:ElectAbuzzzz|electAbuzzzz]] <sup>([[User talk:ElectAbuzzzz|TALK]])</sup> 09:34, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
 
* It's good for a card article, but aren't featured articles supposed to have more... content? I'm not saying it should be improved, I mean, if we really start featuring monthly and there's nothing better, this could work - but compared to other FA, it's... lacking content. --[[User:ElectAbuzzzz|electAbuzzzz]] <sup>([[User talk:ElectAbuzzzz|TALK]])</sup> 09:34, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
 
* I admit TCG is underrated but there like Electabuzz said there might be a lot for a TCG but not enough for an FA. Also I think there are so many other FA's to choose and bit too much being nominated for the run up to be picked...--[[User:Wowy|Wowy]] 07:39, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
 
* I admit TCG is underrated but there like Electabuzz said there might be a lot for a TCG but not enough for an FA. Also I think there are so many other FA's to choose and bit too much being nominated for the run up to be picked...--[[User:Wowy|Wowy]] 07:39, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
  +
* See comment on Bulbasaur. [[User:JirachiWishmaker0802|JirachiWishmaker0802]] 11:43, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:43, 16 September 2008

Support (1)

  • Likely the most in-depth TCG article there is, it should be the example for the rest. TTEchidna 00:03, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Well, featured articles are meant to be examples for others and the TCG is lacking so it is good to find a card this in depth (compared to some others that are basically a set, release date and moves.) Also, it is the most well-known Pokémon card. Aura-Knight 16:49, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Oppose (1)

It's an good acticle but it's far below FA quality. MathijsP 06:56, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Other comments

  • It's good for a card article, but aren't featured articles supposed to have more... content? I'm not saying it should be improved, I mean, if we really start featuring monthly and there's nothing better, this could work - but compared to other FA, it's... lacking content. --electAbuzzzz (TALK) 09:34, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
  • I admit TCG is underrated but there like Electabuzz said there might be a lot for a TCG but not enough for an FA. Also I think there are so many other FA's to choose and bit too much being nominated for the run up to be picked...--Wowy 07:39, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
  • See comment on Bulbasaur. JirachiWishmaker0802 11:43, 16 September 2008 (UTC)