Talk:Charizard (Base Set 4)/Featured article candidate/Nomination 1: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
(agreed) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====Support ( | ====Support (6)==== | ||
*Likely the most in-depth TCG article there is, it should be the example for the rest. '''[[User:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#FF0000">''TTE''</span>]][[User talk:TTEchidna|chidna]]''' 00:03, 30 August 2008 (UTC) | *Likely the most in-depth TCG article there is, it should be the example for the rest. '''[[User:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#FF0000">''TTE''</span>]][[User talk:TTEchidna|chidna]]''' 00:03, 30 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
*Well, featured articles are meant to be examples for others and the TCG is lacking so it is good to find a card this in depth (compared to some others that are basically a set, release date and moves.) Also, it is the most well-known Pokémon card. [[User:Aura-Knight|Aura-Knight]] 16:49, 30 August 2008 (UTC) | *Well, featured articles are meant to be examples for others and the TCG is lacking so it is good to find a card this in depth (compared to some others that are basically a set, release date and moves.) Also, it is the most well-known Pokémon card. [[User:Aura-Knight|Aura-Knight]] 16:49, 30 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
*One of my favorite articles due to its subject, its description and its <s>plot</s> infomation. '''[[User:Optimatum|<span class="explain" title="Optimus35"><sc>Θρtιmαtum♏</sc></span>]]<sub>[[User talk:Optimatum|Talk]]|[[User:Optimatum/sig/Pikachu|Links]]</sub> 11:47, 24 November 2008 (UTC) | *One of my favorite articles due to its subject, its description and its <s>plot</s> infomation. '''[[User:Optimatum|<span class="explain" title="Optimus35"><sc>Θρtιmαtum♏</sc></span>]]<sub>[[User talk:Optimatum|Talk]]|[[User:Optimatum/sig/Pikachu|Links]]</sub> 11:47, 24 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
*Despite what some may say, this article is clear-cut and straight to the point. [[User:Ht14|<span style="color:#D5AA00"><sup>''ht''</sup></span>]][[User talk:Ht14|<span style="color:#C0C0C0"><small>''14''</small></span>]] 04:00, 3 December 2008 (UTC) | *Despite what some may say, this article is clear-cut and straight to the point. [[User:Ht14|<span style="color:#D5AA00"><sup>''ht''</sup></span>]][[User talk:Ht14|<span style="color:#C0C0C0"><small>''14''</small></span>]] 04:00, 3 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
*It is the model for making trainer card pages, so I think this should be a FA! [[User:Christiangamer7|Ninjaboy]] 17:21, 7 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
====Oppose (1)==== | ====Oppose (1)==== | ||
Revision as of 17:21, 7 February 2009
Support (6)
- Likely the most in-depth TCG article there is, it should be the example for the rest. TTEchidna 00:03, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
- Well, featured articles are meant to be examples for others and the TCG is lacking so it is good to find a card this in depth (compared to some others that are basically a set, release date and moves.) Also, it is the most well-known Pokémon card. Aura-Knight 16:49, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
- Now that article brings back memories... Anyhoo, amazing TCG article, it's insanely in-depth. Probably the best TCG Article here. - Kogoro | Talk to me | 04:10, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
- One of my favorite articles due to its subject, its description and its
plotinfomation. Θρtιmαtum♏Talk|Links 11:47, 24 November 2008 (UTC) - Despite what some may say, this article is clear-cut and straight to the point. ht14 04:00, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
- It is the model for making trainer card pages, so I think this should be a FA! Ninjaboy 17:21, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
Oppose (1)
It's an good acticle but it's far below FA quality. MathijsP 06:56, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
Other comments
- It's good for a card article, but aren't featured articles supposed to have more... content? I'm not saying it should be improved, I mean, if we really start featuring monthly and there's nothing better, this could work - but compared to other FA, it's... lacking content. --electAbuzzzz (TALK) 09:34, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
- I admit TCG is underrated but there like Electabuzz said there might be a lot for a TCG but not enough for an FA. Also I think there are so many other FA's to choose and bit too much being nominated for the run up to be picked...--Wowy 07:39, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
- See comment on Bulbasaur. JirachiWishmaker0802 11:43, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
