Talk:Brock/Featured article candidate: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
AdamDuffield (talk | contribs) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (20 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===Support ( | ====Support (19)==== | ||
*I'm really happy to see someone put this up as a FAC, considering how much work I've put into the article. There's still a little more work to be done - the manga section makes me sad because it still has a picture ganked from Serebii - but otherwise I do think this is one of our best articles. --[[User:Pie|Pie]] <sup>~[[User talk:Pie|♪]][[Special:Contributions/Pie|♫]]</sup> 18:25, 8 May 2007 (UTC) | *I'm really happy to see someone put this up as a FAC, considering how much work I've put into the article. There's still a little more work to be done - the manga section makes me sad because it still has a picture ganked from Serebii - but otherwise I do think this is one of our best articles. --[[User:Pie|Pie]] <sup>~[[User talk:Pie|♪]][[Special:Contributions/Pie|♫]]</sup> 18:25, 8 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
*I definitely think it's one the most in-depth articles in Bulbapedia... I blame you totally for it, Pie. '''[[User:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#FF0000;">T</span>]][[User talk:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#FF0000;">T</span>]][[wp:Echidna|<span style="color:#FF0000;">E</span><span style="color:#0000FF;">chidna</span>]]''' 04:02, 16 August 2007 (UTC) | *I definitely think it's one the most in-depth articles in Bulbapedia... I blame you totally for it, Pie. '''[[User:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#FF0000;">T</span>]][[User talk:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#FF0000;">T</span>]][[wp:Echidna|<span style="color:#FF0000;">E</span><span style="color:#0000FF;">chidna</span>]]''' 04:02, 16 August 2007 (UTC) | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
*Very nice, high quality article. Perfect grammar, nice detail. Good job! -[[User:Politoed666|Politoed666]] 01:56, 7 September 2007 (UTC) | *Very nice, high quality article. Perfect grammar, nice detail. Good job! -[[User:Politoed666|Politoed666]] 01:56, 7 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
*This is an amazing article! --[[User:Shiny Noctowl|<span style="color: blue">Shiny Noctowl</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Shiny Noctowl|<span style="color: red">Talk</span>]]|[[Special:Contributions/Shiny Noctowl|<span style="color: brown">Contribs</span>]]</sup> | *This is an amazing article! --[[User:Shiny Noctowl|<span style="color: blue">Shiny Noctowl</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Shiny Noctowl|<span style="color: red">Talk</span>]]|[[Special:Contributions/Shiny Noctowl|<span style="color: brown">Contribs</span>]]</sup> 01:27, 5 October 2007 (UTC) | ||
*Nice, Nice, really really nice. Good grammar. Long article. Everything. Good Pictures too. --[[User:GlalieGuy]] | *Nice, Nice, really really nice. Good grammar. Long article. Everything. Good Pictures too. --[[User:GlalieGuy]] | ||
*Mmmm.. win. [[User:TinaTheKirlia|<span style="color:#E75480;">TinaTheKirlia</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:TinaTheKirlia|<span style="color:#E75480;">♪</span>]][[User:TinaTheKirlia/Sandbox|<span style="color:#E75480;">☆</span> | *Mmmm.. win. [[User:TinaTheKirlia|<span style="color:#E75480;">TinaTheKirlia</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:TinaTheKirlia|<span style="color:#E75480;">♪</span>]][[User:TinaTheKirlia/Sandbox|<span style="color:#E75480;">☆</span>]]</sup> 16:14, 17 October 2007 (UTC) | ||
* Very, very descriptive article [[User:Espeon360|<span style="color:#00CC00;">T</span><span style="color:#00FF00;">h</span><span style="color:#66FF00;">e</span> | * Very, very descriptive article [[User:Espeon360|<span style="color:#00CC00;">T</span><span style="color:#00FF00;">h</span><span style="color:#66FF00;">e</span>]][[User talk:Espeon360|<span style="color:#990033;">E</span><span style="color:#990066;">s</span><span style="color:#990099;">p</span><span style="color:#9900CC;">e</span><span style="color:#9900FF;">o</span><span style="color:#9933FF;">n</span>]][[User:Espeon360/Menu|<span style="color:#FF0000;">M</span><span style="color:#FF0033;">a</span><span style="color:#FF0066;">s</span><span style="color:#FF0099;">t</span><span style="color:#FF00cc;">e</span><span style="color:#FF00ff;">r</span>]][[User:Espeon360|--]] 11:14, 16 December 2007 (UTC) | ||
*Quite good. {{User:Optimus35/sig/ | *Quite good. '''<sc>[[User:Optimus35|{{tt|Optimatum♏|Optimus35}}]]</sc><sup><span style=" color:navy">[[User talk:Ph34r4ever|Talk]]|[[User:Optimus35/sig/Pikachu|♊]]</span></sup>Hi''' 11:16, 16 December 2007 (UTC) | ||
*Really really good!-[[User:Billy4b2004|Billy4b2004]] 11:32, 17 January 2008 (UTC)-[[User:MathijsP|MathijsP]] | *Really really good!-[[User:Billy4b2004|Billy4b2004]] 11:32, 17 January 2008 (UTC)-[[User:MathijsP|MathijsP]] | ||
*IMO, the most information filled page on Bulbapedia! | *IMO, the most information filled page on Bulbapedia! [[User:ZanderX|<span style="color: #332303">Z</span><span style="color: #0080FF">a</span><span style="color: #332303">n</span><span style="color: #0080FF">d</span><span style="color: #332303">e</span><span style="color: #0080FF">r</span>]] 09:43, 11 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
*This is one of the best of Bulbapedia articles and it should be a featured one | *This is one of the best of Bulbapedia articles and it should be a featured one | ||
*This is very detailed and interesting to read, I would definatly like this to become featured - 1 April 2008 | *This is very detailed and interesting to read, I would definatly like this to become featured - [[User:AdamDuffield|AdamDuffield]] - 1 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
= | * I vote for this.....[[User:Darth Cookie Monster|<span style="color:#000;">C is for Cookie</span>]] 01:48, 17 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
===Other comments=== | *Very detailed, this is a definite FA--[[User:Kuki|<span style="color:#b00000;">Kuki</span>]][[User talk:Kuki|<span style="color:#2c41a4;">Ta</span><span style="color:#049440;">lk</span>]] 01:50, 17 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
*One of the best articles on Bulbapedia. '''[[User:Misty-may-dawn rulz|<span style="color:#ED9121">Misty</span>-<span style="color:#CC0000">May</span>-<span style="color:#0000CC">Dawn</span>]] [[User talk:Misty-may-dawn rulz|<span style="color:#00CC00">rulz</span>]]''' 09:44, 13 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
*Great article but way to large, split maybe? [[User:Kilik|Kilik]] 12:06, 23 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
*Great page nothing wrong.--[[User:CoolPikachu!|<span style="color:#007FFF;">'''Cool'''</span>]][[User talk:CoolPikachu!|<span style="color:#FFBA00;">'''Pika'''</span>]][[User Talk:CoolPikachu!/Archive 1|<span style="color:#FFBA00;">'''chu!'''</span>]] 00:29, 26 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
*No Complaints.--PikaNinja7 | |||
*Now that all of Brock's cards in the TCG have pages, I think he deserves it. ''[[User:Moldy orange|<sup style="color:#4B5320;">'''Moldy'''</sup>]][[User talk:Moldy orange|<sub style="color:#ED9121;">'''Orange'''</sub>]]'' 00:34, 31 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
*This a very good article to read over and over I can say I have read it a '''lot''' of times Pokemonboy 19:08, 14 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
====Object (0)==== | |||
====Other comments==== | |||
*Why is it that when I push the FACs, people think I'm only trying to get this article featured? --[[User:Pie|Pie]] <sup>~[[User talk:Pie|♪]][[Special:Contributions/Pie|♫]]</sup> 03:54, 30 June 2007 (UTC) | *Why is it that when I push the FACs, people think I'm only trying to get this article featured? --[[User:Pie|Pie]] <sup>~[[User talk:Pie|♪]][[Special:Contributions/Pie|♫]]</sup> 03:54, 30 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
**... actually, on second thought, don't answer that. --[[User:Pie|Pie]] <sup>~[[User talk:Pie|♪]][[Special:Contributions/Pie|♫]]</sup> 03:54, 30 June 2007 (UTC) | **... actually, on second thought, don't answer that. --[[User:Pie|Pie]] <sup>~[[User talk:Pie|♪]][[Special:Contributions/Pie|♫]]</sup> 03:54, 30 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
*I'm sure this is really good page, but it looks sooo long. I think it needs to be broken up more or something. I just can't bring myself to wade through all that text. --[[User:Greengiant|Greengiant]] 06:15, 1 July 2007 (UTC) | *I'm sure this is really good page, but it looks sooo long. I think it needs to be broken up more or something. I just can't bring myself to wade through all that text. --[[User:Greengiant|Greengiant]] 06:15, 1 July 2007 (UTC) | ||
*I would vote "support," but I already voted for [[Pokémon world in relation to the real world]]. -- | *I would vote "support," but I already voted for [[Pokémon world in relation to the real world]]. --[[User:Shiny Noctowl|<span style="color: brown">S</span><span style="color: red">h</span><span style="color: brown">i</span><span style="color: red">n</span><span style="color: brown">y</span> <span style="color: red">N</span><span style="color: brown">o</span><span style="color: red">c</span><span style="color: brown">t</span><span style="color: red">o</span><span style="color: brown">w</span><span style="color: red">l</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Shiny Noctowl|<span style="color: brown">T</span><span style="color: red">a</span><span style="color: brown">l</span><span style="color: red">k</span>]] | [[User:Shiny Noctowl/Fun|<span style="color: brown">F</span><span style="color: red">u</span><span style="color: brown">n</span>]]</sup> 19:26, 16 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
**Uh, it's not like voting for one out of the ones up here to be accepted as a featured article. It is a judgment of the individual article for the status. All of these could be accepted as Featured Articles without causing conflict. Note how I've voted that I support several. ^^o --[[User:Pie|Pie]] <sup>~[[User talk:Pie|♪]][[Special:Contributions/Pie|♫]]</sup> 04:16, 26 September 2007 (UTC) | **Uh, it's not like voting for one out of the ones up here to be accepted as a featured article. It is a judgment of the individual article for the status. All of these could be accepted as Featured Articles without causing conflict. Note how I've voted that I support several. ^^o --[[User:Pie|Pie]] <sup>~[[User talk:Pie|♪]][[Special:Contributions/Pie|♫]]</sup> 04:16, 26 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 06:54, 12 August 2014
Support (19)
- I'm really happy to see someone put this up as a FAC, considering how much work I've put into the article. There's still a little more work to be done - the manga section makes me sad because it still has a picture ganked from Serebii - but otherwise I do think this is one of our best articles. --Pie ~♪♫ 18:25, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- I definitely think it's one the most in-depth articles in Bulbapedia... I blame you totally for it, Pie. TTEchidna 04:02, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
- Very nice, high quality article. Perfect grammar, nice detail. Good job! -Politoed666 01:56, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- This is an amazing article! --Shiny NoctowlTalk|Contribs 01:27, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Nice, Nice, really really nice. Good grammar. Long article. Everything. Good Pictures too. --User:GlalieGuy
- Mmmm.. win. TinaTheKirlia ♪☆ 16:14, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
- Quite good. Optimatum♏Talk|♊Hi 11:16, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
- Really really good!-Billy4b2004 11:32, 17 January 2008 (UTC)-MathijsP
- IMO, the most information filled page on Bulbapedia! Zander 09:43, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
- This is one of the best of Bulbapedia articles and it should be a featured one
- This is very detailed and interesting to read, I would definatly like this to become featured - AdamDuffield - 1 April 2008 (UTC)
- I vote for this.....C is for Cookie 01:48, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
- One of the best articles on Bulbapedia. Misty-May-Dawn rulz 09:44, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- Great article but way to large, split maybe? Kilik 12:06, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
- No Complaints.--PikaNinja7
- Now that all of Brock's cards in the TCG have pages, I think he deserves it. MoldyOrange 00:34, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
- This a very good article to read over and over I can say I have read it a lot of times Pokemonboy 19:08, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Object (0)
Other comments
- Why is it that when I push the FACs, people think I'm only trying to get this article featured? --Pie ~♪♫ 03:54, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
- I'm sure this is really good page, but it looks sooo long. I think it needs to be broken up more or something. I just can't bring myself to wade through all that text. --Greengiant 06:15, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
- I would vote "support," but I already voted for Pokémon world in relation to the real world. --Shiny NoctowlTalk | Fun 19:26, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
- Uh, it's not like voting for one out of the ones up here to be accepted as a featured article. It is a judgment of the individual article for the status. All of these could be accepted as Featured Articles without causing conflict. Note how I've voted that I support several. ^^o --Pie ~♪♫ 04:16, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
