Please remember to follow the manual of style and code of conduct at all times.
Check BNN and Bulbanews for up-to-date Pokémon news and discuss it on the forums or in our IRC channel #bulbagarden on irc.systemnet.info.

Talk:Brandon's legendary golems

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Revision as of 13:40, 24 October 2009 by WaterUser (Talk | contribs) (did he realese them?)

Jump to: navigation, search

Fandom name?

Who Officially called them "Regi's"? Just wondering.. --Catu the Cat 22:19, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Yes, a more correct term would be the three legendary golems. –MasterKenobi 22:25, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
Regi is the beginning of all of the golem's names. Brandon's Regi's sounds better then Brandon's three legendary golems...btw. --PsychicRider 22:28, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
We had an AIM vote between "Regis", "Legendary Golems", "Golems", "Golem Trio", and "Brandon's wierd humanoid thingies with dots for eyes". The last one came second, but we settled for Regis. "Brandon's three legendary golems" sounds bad. Have a better idea? --electAbuzzzz 22:29, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

I moved it

Do you think I did the right thing? --CUBONE PWNS (Planet CuboneBone Club) THE VERY BEST PAGE! 23:02, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

No. There was a discussion ongoing. And even if there weren't, you should have started one. Although at least you ask if you did right, instead of some people just constantly thinking they can never be wrong, so congrats.The Dark Fiddler - You enter a poorly lit room... 23:05, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

did he realese them?

in pillars of friendship, did it actually say that Brandon release his regis? i just watched the dub airing of it, and he said something about himself staying behind with them. all he said is that regirock/ice/steel would be there to protect regigias. he neither did the act of or said anything about releasing them. --WaterUser (page, talk) 13:40, 24 October 2009 (UTC)