Talk:Berry/Featured article candidate: Difference between revisions

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 14: Line 14:
Don't get me wrong, it's a good article; but, I think it's just good for the images. Speaking of which, the images have yet to be fully uploaded, so... [[User:Ht14|<span style="color:#FF1111"><sup>'''''ht'''''</sup></span>]][[User talk:Ht14|<span style="color:#DAA520"><small>''14''</small></span>]] 03:53, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
Don't get me wrong, it's a good article; but, I think it's just good for the images. Speaking of which, the images have yet to be fully uploaded, so... [[User:Ht14|<span style="color:#FF1111"><sup>'''''ht'''''</sup></span>]][[User talk:Ht14|<span style="color:#DAA520"><small>''14''</small></span>]] 03:53, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
:Shouldn't this be in oppose then? [[User:Turtwig A|Turt]][[wig]] [[Turtwig (Pokémon)|A]] ([[User talk:Turtwig A|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Turtwig A|contribs]]) 12:26, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
:Shouldn't this be in oppose then? [[User:Turtwig A|Turt]][[wig]] [[Turtwig (Pokémon)|A]] ([[User talk:Turtwig A|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Turtwig A|contribs]]) 12:26, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
::Point made. Changing to '''oppose'''. [[User:Ht14|<span style="color:#FF1111"><sup>'''''ht'''''</sup></span>]][[User talk:Ht14|<span style="color:#DAA520"><small>''14''</small></span>]] 05:37, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:37, 22 February 2010

Berry

Support (4)

  • Support A very comprehensive article with information on every stage in the history of berries, from Gen II to Gen IV. Aesthetically pleasing, it is evident that a lot of time and effort went in to making the article what it is today. --RexRacer 18:34, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Very good and well written! Definitely worthy! Mudkipluvr4ever 18:56, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Support! Rex hit the nail on the head, it's very in depth and covers berries in all canon by a reasonable amount. Maybe Munchlax's Berry Bonanza and Swalot Plop could be given a mention. I could try writing something up on each if nobody else wants to. Besides that I think it meets the standard. And I'm assuming we're not looking to have every berry that appears in the anime included in the article? --Emp, out 20:10, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Support. Very comprehensive, uses templates where it should, seems to have everything necessary. --SnorlaxMonster 10:44, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Object (1)

  • I think that there are better articles than this one that could be an FAC article. - Pokémon1234567890 19:49, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
    • How does this mean the article isn't good enough for FAC? Turtwig A (talk | contribs) 21:51, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Other comments

Don't get me wrong, it's a good article; but, I think it's just good for the images. Speaking of which, the images have yet to be fully uploaded, so... ht14 03:53, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Shouldn't this be in oppose then? Turtwig A (talk | contribs) 12:26, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
Point made. Changing to oppose. ht14 05:37, 22 February 2010 (UTC)