Talk:April Fool's Day 2005/Featured article candidate: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (→Support (0)) |
Fabu-Vinny (talk | contribs) m (Protected "Talk:April Fool's Day 2005/Featured article candidate": closed discussion [edit=sysop:move=sysop]) |
||
| (12 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Support (1)= | ====Support (1)==== | ||
* A unique report that is informative and well illustrated. | * A unique report that is informative and well illustrated. - [[User:Zhen Lin|振霖]]<sub>[[User talk:Zhen Lin|T]]</sub> 17:39, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC) | ||
* <s>I agree with the previous comment. In addition, it may be wise to have another candidate ready, as this article will only be relevant for a few weeks at the most. - [[User:Argy|Argy]] 01:07, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)</s> | |||
=Object ( | ====Object (3)==== | ||
* | * The article seems to have very limited relevance now that the day had passed, and is in all honesty little more than a list of events, with little depth. Hardly the kind of material we'd want for our first feature. - [[User:Archaic]] | ||
=Other comments= | * Agreed. The first impression that people get from coming to Bulbapedia could very well be the featured article, being the cream of the crop, if this is a page of jokes... Then well I don't think it's a good advertisement if anything else. And while it is informative, it has little content at all, being nothing more of a basic list and a couple of screenshots. Little effort has been put into the article. - [[User:Ferret|Ferret]] | ||
* Weird article, over two years out of date now. And we've got a lot of better articles now. --[[User:Pie|Pie]] <sup>~[[User talk:Pie|♪]][[Special:Contributions/Pie|♫]]</sup> 18:26, 8 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
====Other comments==== | |||
* A reminder: the featured article of the day is different from a featured article - an article will always have featured article status, and a featured article of the day is necessarily a featured article; however, a featured article does not necessarily have to ever be, or have been a featured article of the day. - [[User:Zhen Lin|振霖]]<sub>[[User talk:Zhen Lin|T]]</sub> 16:05, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 17:41, 30 October 2008
Support (1)
- A unique report that is informative and well illustrated. - 振霖T 17:39, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I agree with the previous comment. In addition, it may be wise to have another candidate ready, as this article will only be relevant for a few weeks at the most. - Argy 01:07, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Object (3)
- The article seems to have very limited relevance now that the day had passed, and is in all honesty little more than a list of events, with little depth. Hardly the kind of material we'd want for our first feature. - User:Archaic
- Agreed. The first impression that people get from coming to Bulbapedia could very well be the featured article, being the cream of the crop, if this is a page of jokes... Then well I don't think it's a good advertisement if anything else. And while it is informative, it has little content at all, being nothing more of a basic list and a couple of screenshots. Little effort has been put into the article. - Ferret
- Weird article, over two years out of date now. And we've got a lot of better articles now. --Pie ~♪♫ 18:26, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
Other comments
- A reminder: the featured article of the day is different from a featured article - an article will always have featured article status, and a featured article of the day is necessarily a featured article; however, a featured article does not necessarily have to ever be, or have been a featured article of the day. - 振霖T 16:05, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
