Talk:3TrainerPoké $: Difference between revisions
m (→Baby Kanashan?) |
OwnageMuch (talk | contribs) (→Mew Trick: new section) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
It occoured to me that mabey 3TrainerPoke was origonally a baby kanashan due to evoling into two pokemon that have offspring since birth...{{unsigned|GoldHuksy}} | It occoured to me that mabey 3TrainerPoke was origonally a baby kanashan due to evoling into two pokemon that have offspring since birth...{{unsigned|GoldHuksy}} | ||
== Mew Trick == | |||
"The special stat required to catch a 3TrainerPoké using method #3 of the Mew glitch is 0. However, since no Pokémon has a special stat of 0, " | |||
STOP RIGHT THERE! Use 256. 256 = 0, 257 = 1, 258 = 2 etc. | |||
<br> | |||
[[User:OwnageMuch|OwnageMuch]] 05:08, 12 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:08, 12 February 2010
I don't know if its just my internet but the formating of this page seems a bit... well... odd I guess, because the type effectiveness section is mixed in with the box on the side that has all the info about the glitch. If its not just my computer someone should fix this.--MysteryHeff? TALK 02:55, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
- I think its your browser, but the infobox picture is pretty big. The Dark Fiddler - Nos hablamos? 02:58, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
ok thanks.--MysteryHeff? TALK 23:10, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
Baby Kanashan?
It occoured to me that mabey 3TrainerPoke was origonally a baby kanashan due to evoling into two pokemon that have offspring since birth...- unsigned comment from GoldHuksy (talk • contribs)
Mew Trick
"The special stat required to catch a 3TrainerPoké using method #3 of the Mew glitch is 0. However, since no Pokémon has a special stat of 0, "
STOP RIGHT THERE! Use 256. 256 = 0, 257 = 1, 258 = 2 etc.
OwnageMuch 05:08, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
