This is a list of changes made recently to pages linked from a specified page (or to members of a specified category).
Pages on your watchlist are bold.
27 April 2017
Shiny Pokémon (diff | hist) . .(+78) . .Froggy25(talk | contribs)(This has already been talked about in the talk page. (added the ref, if someone less lazy wants to add the relevant code from pokecrystal github, feel free to do so))
(cur | prev) . .(-627) . .Pumpkinking0192(talk | contribs)(I strongly think this is unnecessary; it's the "Other" section, so it should be clear that these can go either way. We don't need to hold the reader's hand in every little intricacy of what certain things suggest or imply or how they can be interpreted.)
(cur | prev) . .(+314) . .Blueapple128(talk | contribs)(add back the explanations of how each Other point could go for either side. Special Pokemon aren't Mythical according to the Special Pokemon article)
(cur | prev) . .(-293) . .SnorlaxMonster(talk | contribs)(→Potential Legendary Pokémon: We haven't drawn a conclusion, so everything is "inconclusive" in the strictest sense. Points should be listed under the conclusion that they indicate.)
(cur | prev) . .(0) . .Pumpkinking0192(talk | contribs)(Term usage by a tenuously canon source for a non-game medium is absolutely inconclusive, not "evidence for". || Using bullet points as a method of "improving readability" seems a bit... dumbed-down to me, but whatever, I guess. I'd vote for prose, though.)
(cur | prev) . .(+31) . .Pumpkinking0192(talk | contribs)(→Evidence for: I mean, obviously the summaries were written by their authors. The question is whether those authors are official or not.)
(cur | prev) . .(-2,275) . .Pumpkinking0192(talk | contribs)(Undo revision 2622267 by RubyLeafGreenCrystal — This is nearly unsalvageable rambling... next time, be more careful with your spelling and grammar, use wikilinks and paragraphs, and try to explain the actual plot instead of a town-by-town guidebook.)
(cur | prev) . .(-239) . .Pumpkinking0192(talk | contribs)(Aside from the fact that many Legendaries do have changed names...evidence for or against must be explicitly about whether the label "Legendary" is used for them, not about whether they have traits that Legendaries often have. The latter is an assumption.)
Ice (type) (diff | hist) . .(-91) . .Pumpkinking0192(talk | contribs)(→Trivia: Removing this trivium — it belongs on Wulfric's page as an "only one that doesn't follow this pattern" trivium, not here as a "this pattern exists, except for Wulfric" trivium. || Adding a point from the talk page.)