Bulbapedia talk:Code of conduct: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (whee~) |
(what about...) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:::I don't think so. It does say it doesn't cover edit wars, but maybe it should? I know it says it isn't against the code of conduct, but technically it is because it's about ignoring what someone else is saying, and just following your own opinion. — <small>[[User talk:The dark lord trombonator|<font color="#0000C8">THE TROM</font></small>]] — 06:15, 3 January 2009 (UTC) | :::I don't think so. It does say it doesn't cover edit wars, but maybe it should? I know it says it isn't against the code of conduct, but technically it is because it's about ignoring what someone else is saying, and just following your own opinion. — <small>[[User talk:The dark lord trombonator|<font color="#0000C8">THE TROM</font></small>]] — 06:15, 3 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
::::My take on edit wars is that it's how you behave during the edit war that matters, not whether or not it takes place. If people play nice we shouldn't have too many wars, but the actual editing-reverting-re-editing process, and the potential consequences, are already covered elsewhere. Thus, I felt no need to re-hash punishments for that, instead seeking to make that process more pleasant. '''[[User:evkl|evkl]]''' 06:20, 3 January 2009 (UTC) | ::::My take on edit wars is that it's how you behave during the edit war that matters, not whether or not it takes place. If people play nice we shouldn't have too many wars, but the actual editing-reverting-re-editing process, and the potential consequences, are already covered elsewhere. Thus, I felt no need to re-hash punishments for that, instead seeking to make that process more pleasant. '''[[User:evkl|evkl]]''' 06:20, 3 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
:::::Sure thing. What about using edit summaries to explain what and why changes are being made? This is not in the MoS either, and inclusion here could get rid of those annoyingly angry "WHAT ARE YOU DOING!!!!1!eleven!!1" messages. — <small>[[User talk:The dark lord trombonator|<font color="#0000C8">THE TROM</font></small>]] — 08:45, 3 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 08:45, 3 January 2009
Hey folks, now let's look at this and see what could be improved!
Anyone got any ideas whatsoever? And I'm not talking the stylistic improvements, I'm talking the specifics. Ought we address superspecific issues or no? TTEchidna 05:56, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
- Well I was gonna say "BULBASPACE IT NOW" but TTE got in the way.... I see nothing wrong. What do you mean "specifics"? — THE TROM — 06:00, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
- Specific things of what not to do. TTEchidna 06:12, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
- I don't think so. It does say it doesn't cover edit wars, but maybe it should? I know it says it isn't against the code of conduct, but technically it is because it's about ignoring what someone else is saying, and just following your own opinion. — THE TROM — 06:15, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
- My take on edit wars is that it's how you behave during the edit war that matters, not whether or not it takes place. If people play nice we shouldn't have too many wars, but the actual editing-reverting-re-editing process, and the potential consequences, are already covered elsewhere. Thus, I felt no need to re-hash punishments for that, instead seeking to make that process more pleasant. evkl 06:20, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
- Sure thing. What about using edit summaries to explain what and why changes are being made? This is not in the MoS either, and inclusion here could get rid of those annoyingly angry "WHAT ARE YOU DOING!!!!1!eleven!!1" messages. — THE TROM — 08:45, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
- My take on edit wars is that it's how you behave during the edit war that matters, not whether or not it takes place. If people play nice we shouldn't have too many wars, but the actual editing-reverting-re-editing process, and the potential consequences, are already covered elsewhere. Thus, I felt no need to re-hash punishments for that, instead seeking to make that process more pleasant. evkl 06:20, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
- I don't think so. It does say it doesn't cover edit wars, but maybe it should? I know it says it isn't against the code of conduct, but technically it is because it's about ignoring what someone else is saying, and just following your own opinion. — THE TROM — 06:15, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
- Specific things of what not to do. TTEchidna 06:12, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
