Bulbapedia talk:Blocking policy

Blocking administrators should be required to have registered e-mail addresses

I think that any administrator who blocks a user, for any reason, should have his/her e-mail address on the Bulbapedia system, to allow the blocked user to e-mail the administrator and ask for more details for the reason of the blocking. User142 | Talk 05:24, 12 January 2006 (CST)

The block log is visible to all, and I think a blocked user will see the reason they are blocked when they try to edit pages. In any case, as per current policy, appeals go to the Editor-in-Chief. - 振霖_T 02:54, 13 January 2006 (CST)

It should be fairly easy to appeal the ban on BMGf as well anyway, especially with that allowing for posting by unregged users, unlike 'pedia. --Archaic 06:14, 13 January 2006 (CST)

You should be able to edit your tpage anyway, even if blocked.--Tmwps 17:12, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, but some people get banned because of their talk page. The Dark Fiddler - You enter a poorly lit room... 17:33, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

How's that?--Tmwps 06:12, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Inappropriate comments, such as swearing and etc. --Clarky13 06:15, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

What's wrong with swearing? Wikipedia isn't censored, so why should we be?--Tmwps 06:42, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

It's because.. this is not Wikipedia. It's Bulbapedia. And besides, there's a forum, you can do swearing there.. If I'm not mistaken. ◄Kevzo8► 06:47, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Right.--Tmwps 09:31, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Regarding the point on uncivil behavior

Is it okay to use abusive language under the proviso that it is not offensive to anyone?--Tmwps 17:12, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Considering the language is abusive.... no. — THE TROM — 07:05, 11 April 2009 (UTC)